These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11055984)

  • 1. The role of electroporation in defibrillation.
    Al-Khadra A; Nikolski V; Efimov IR
    Circ Res; 2000 Oct; 87(9):797-804. PubMed ID: 11055984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.
    Fedorov VV; Kostecki G; Hemphill M; Efimov IR
    Heart Rhythm; 2008 Apr; 5(4):593-604. PubMed ID: 18362029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shock-induced epicardial and endocardial virtual electrodes leading to ventricular fibrillation via reentry, graded responses, and transmural activation.
    Evans FG; Gray RA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15028078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repetitive endocardial focal discharges during ventricular fibrillation with prolonged global ischemia in isolated rabbit hearts.
    Wu TJ; Lin SF; Hsieh YC; Chiu YT; Ting CT
    Circ J; 2009 Oct; 73(10):1803-11. PubMed ID: 19652397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.
    Wang YT; Efimov IR; Cheng Y
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2012 Aug; 303(4):H439-49. PubMed ID: 22730387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of the relationship between preshock state and virtual electrode polarization-induced propagated graded responses resulting in arrhythmia induction.
    Bourn DW; Gray RA; Trayanova NA
    Heart Rhythm; 2006 May; 3(5):583-95. PubMed ID: 16648066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual electrode-induced reexcitation: A mechanism of defibrillation.
    Cheng Y; Mowrey KA; Van Wagoner DR; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
    Circ Res; 1999 Nov; 85(11):1056-66. PubMed ID: 10571537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-energy defibrillation with nanosecond electric shocks.
    Varghese F; Neuber JU; Xie F; Philpott JM; Pakhomov AG; Zemlin CW
    Cardiovasc Res; 2017 Dec; 113(14):1789-1797. PubMed ID: 29016714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure.
    Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE
    Cardiovasc Res; 2004 Jan; 61(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 14732200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intracellular calcium and vulnerability to fibrillation and defibrillation in Langendorff-perfused rabbit ventricles.
    Hwang GS; Hayashi H; Tang L; Ogawa M; Hernandez H; Tan AY; Li H; Karagueuzian HS; Weiss JN; Lin SF; Chen PS
    Circulation; 2006 Dec; 114(24):2595-603. PubMed ID: 17116770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological mechanisms for the initiation and maintenance of ventricular fibrillation in nonischemic rabbit hearts.
    Watanabe Y; Toda H; Uchida H
    Heart Vessels Suppl; 1987; 2():69-87. PubMed ID: 3449506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High voltage shock induced cellular electrophysiological effects: transient refractoriness and bimodal changes in action potential duration.
    Li HG; Jones DL; Yee R; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1225-35. PubMed ID: 7659576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arrhythmogenic changes in action potential configuration in the ventricle induced by DC shocks.
    Kodama I; Sakuma I; Shibata N; Honjo H; Toyama J
    J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():92-9. PubMed ID: 10688309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
    Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
    Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High [Ca2+]o-induced electrical heterogeneity and extrasystolic activity in isolated canine ventricular epicardium. Phase 2 reentry.
    Di Diego JM; Antzelevitch C
    Circulation; 1994 Apr; 89(4):1839-50. PubMed ID: 7511994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tunnel propagation following defibrillation with ICD shocks: hidden postshock activations in the left ventricular wall underlie isoelectric window.
    Constantino J; Long Y; Ashihara T; Trayanova NA
    Heart Rhythm; 2010 Jul; 7(7):953-61. PubMed ID: 20348028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ventricular proarrhythmic effects of ventricular cycle length and shock strength in a sheep model of transvenous atrial defibrillation.
    Ayers GM; Alferness CA; Ilina M; Wagner DO; Sirokman WA; Adams JM; Griffin JC
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):413-22. PubMed ID: 8281677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of electroporation on cardiac electrophysiology.
    Fedorov VV; Nikolski VP; Efimov IR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 423():433-48. PubMed ID: 18370220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks.
    Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS
    Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intracardiac atrial defibrillation.
    Dosdall DJ; Ideker RE
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Mar; 4(3 Suppl):S51-6. PubMed ID: 17336885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.