These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11056099)
1. Effect of second-phase duration on the strength-duration relation for human transvenous defibrillation. Shorofsky SR; Gold MR Circulation; 2000 Oct; 102(18):2239-42. PubMed ID: 11056099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system. Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized comparison of biphasic waveform tilt using a unipolar defibrillation system. Poole JE; Bardy GH; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Raitt MH; Mehra R; Johnson G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7567589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biphasic waveform defibrillation using a three-electrode transvenous lead system in humans. Marks ML; Johnson G; Hofer BO; Bardy GH J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8186880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of biphasic waveforms for human nonthoracotomy defibrillation. Swartz JF; Fletcher RD; Karasik PE Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2646-54. PubMed ID: 8252675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations. Matula MH; Brooks MJ; Pan Q; Pless BD; Province RA; Echt DS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2154-62. PubMed ID: 9309738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defibrillation efficacy of commercially available biphasic impulses in humans. Importance of negative-phase peak voltage. Tomassoni G; Newby K; Deshpande S; Axtell K; Sra J; Akhtar M; Natale A Circulation; 1997 Apr; 95(7):1822-6. PubMed ID: 9107169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans. Sweeney MO; Natale A; Volosin KJ; Swerdlow CD; Baker JH; Degroot P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11227971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ventricular defibrillation with triphasic waveforms. Huang J; KenKnight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1324-8. PubMed ID: 10725294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation. Gold MR; Shorofsky SR Circulation; 1997 Nov; 96(10):3517-20. PubMed ID: 9396449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of shock waveform on relationship between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold. Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; O'Connor ME; Chen PS J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 9581950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choosing the optimal monophasic and biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation. Walcott GP; Walker RG; Cates AW; Krassowska W; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Sep; 6(9):737-50. PubMed ID: 8556194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of phase duration of biphasic waveforms on defibrillation energy requirements with a 70-microF capacitance. Schauerte P; Schöndube FA; Grossmann M; Dörge H; Stein F; Dohmen B; Moumen A; Erena K; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Stellbrink C Circulation; 1998 May; 97(20):2073-8. PubMed ID: 9610539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]