113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11056698)
1. Lack of agreement between bioimpedance and continuous thermodilution measurement of cardiac output in intensive care unit patients.
Barry BN; Mallick A; Bodenham AR; Vucevic M
Crit Care; 1997; 1(2):71-74. PubMed ID: 11056698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is continuous cardiac output measurement using thermodilution reliable in the critically ill patient?
Boldt J; Menges T; Wollbrück M; Hammermann H; Hempelmann G
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1913-8. PubMed ID: 7988126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison between continuous and intermittent thermodilution measurement of cardiac output during coronary artery bypass operation].
Schulz K; Abel HH; Werning P
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1997 Apr; 32(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 9289022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a new continuous thermodilution cardiac output monitor in critically ill patients: a prospective criterion standard study.
Haller M; Zöllner C; Briegel J; Forst H
Crit Care Med; 1995 May; 23(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 7736744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients.
Sageman WS; Amundson DE
Crit Care Med; 1993 Aug; 21(8):1139-42. PubMed ID: 8339577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.
Maass SW; Roekaerts PM; Lancé MD
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 24746334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive whole-body electrical bioimpedance cardiac output and invasive thermodilution cardiac output in high-risk surgical patients.
Imhoff M; Lehner JH; Löhlein D
Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2812-8. PubMed ID: 10966255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution.
Doering L; Lum E; Dracup K; Friedman A
Crit Care Med; 1995 Oct; 23(10):1667-73. PubMed ID: 7587231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM; Uusitalo AJ
Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 25(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 9187596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM
Crit Care Med; 1999 Oct; 27(10):2206-11. PubMed ID: 10548208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continuous invasive cardiac output monitoring--the Baxter/Edwards Critical-Care Swan Ganz IntelliCath and Viligance system.
Munro HM; Wood CE; Taylor BL; Smith GB
Clin Intensive Care; 1994; 5(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10147254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output.
Yamada T; Tsutsui M; Sugo Y; Sato T; Akazawa T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Ishihara H; Takeda J
Anesth Analg; 2012 Jul; 115(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22467885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of bioimpedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output in comparison with thermodilution method.
Wong KL; Hou PC
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1996 Jun; 34(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 9084523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radial Artery Applanation Tonometry for Continuous Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement: A Comparison With Intermittent Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution in Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery.
Wagner JY; Sarwari H; Schön G; Kubik M; Kluge S; Reichenspurner H; Reuter DA; Saugel B
Crit Care Med; 2015 Jul; 43(7):1423-8. PubMed ID: 25844700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Monitoring cardiac output: esophageal doppler vs thermodilution].
Leone D; Servillo G; De Robertis E; Rossano F; Tufano R
Minerva Anestesiol; 1998; 64(7-8):351-6. PubMed ID: 9796245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac output measurement during cardiac surgery: esophageal Doppler versus pulmonary artery catheter.
Su NY; Huang CJ; Tsai P; Hsu YW; Hung YC; Cheng CR
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 2002 Sep; 40(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 12434609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
