These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11056886)

  • 1. The influence of associability changes in negative patterning and other discriminations.
    Holland PC; Thornton JA; Ciali L
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Oct; 26(4):462-76. PubMed ID: 11056886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of amygdala central nucleus in feature negative discriminations.
    Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 126(5):670-80. PubMed ID: 22889308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consolidation of altered associability information by amygdala central nucleus.
    Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Sep; 133():204-213. PubMed ID: 27427328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditional discrimination learning and negative patterning in rats with neonatal hippocampal lesion induced by ionizing radiation.
    Moreira Rde C; Bueno JL
    Behav Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 138(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 12493628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elemental, configural, and occasion setting mechanisms in biconditional and patterning discriminations.
    Delamater AR; Garr E; Lawrence S; Whitlow JW
    Behav Processes; 2017 Apr; 137():40-52. PubMed ID: 27826037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hippocampal lesions interfere with Pavlovian negative occasion setting.
    Holland PC; Lamoureux JA; Han JS; Gallagher M
    Hippocampus; 1999; 9(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 10226775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occasion setting in Pavlovian ambiguous target discriminations.
    Bueno JL; Holland PC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Nov; 79(3):132-47. PubMed ID: 18657599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-elemental processing in olfactory discrimination tasks needs bilateral input in honeybees.
    Komischke B; Sandoz JC; Lachnit H; Giurfa M
    Behav Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 145(1-2):135-43. PubMed ID: 14529812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disconnection of the basolateral amygdala complex and nucleus accumbens impairs appetitive pavlovian second-order conditioned responses.
    Setlow B; Holland PC; Gallagher M
    Behav Neurosci; 2002 Apr; 116(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 11996312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations.
    McDonald RJ; Murphy RA; Guarraci FA; Gortler JR; White NM; Baker AG
    Hippocampus; 1997; 7(4):371-88. PubMed ID: 9287077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conditional discriminations based on external and internal cues in rats with cytotoxic hippocampal lesions.
    Deacon RM; Bannerman DM; Rawlins NP
    Behav Neurosci; 2001 Feb; 115(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 11256452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dorsolateral striatum is critical for the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability.
    Asem JS; Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 42(5):2203-13. PubMed ID: 26108257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limbic thalamic lesions, appetitively motivated discrimination learning, and training-induced neuronal activity in rabbits.
    Smith DM; Freeman JH; Nicholson D; Gabriel M
    J Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 22(18):8212-21. PubMed ID: 12223575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posttraining but not pretraining lesions of the hippocampus interfere with feature-negative discrimination of fear-potentiated startle.
    Heldt SA; Coover GD; Falls WA
    Hippocampus; 2002; 12(6):774-86. PubMed ID: 12542229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 18248121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two kinds of attention in Pavlovian conditioning: evidence for a hybrid model of learning.
    Haselgrove M; Esber GR; Pearce JM; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):456-70. PubMed ID: 20718552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further investigations of stimulus coding in nonlinear discrimination problems.
    Lachnit H; Reinhard G; Kimmel HD
    Biol Psychol; 2000 Nov; 55(1):57-73. PubMed ID: 11099808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blocking and associability change.
    Jones PM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jul; 39(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23668185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Secondary visual cortex is critical to the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability in rats.
    Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 44(2):1870-7. PubMed ID: 27225533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The basolateral complex of the amygdala is necessary for acquisition but not expression of CS motivational value in appetitive Pavlovian second-order conditioning.
    Setlow B; Gallagher M; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2002 Jun; 15(11):1841-53. PubMed ID: 12081664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.