These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11057352)

  • 1. Comparative study of clinical efficacy and tolerance in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis management with 0.1% olopatadine hydrochloride versus 0.05% ketotifen fumarate.
    Aguilar AJ
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (230):52-5. PubMed ID: 11057352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A forced choice comfort study of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% versus ketotifen fumarate 0.05%.
    Artal MN; Luna JD; Discepola M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (230):64-5. PubMed ID: 11057355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of preservative-free ketotifen fumarate and preserved olopatadine hydrochloride eye drops in the treatment of moderate to severe seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Mortemousque B; Bourcier T; Khairallah M; Messaoud R; Brignole-Baudouin F; Renault D; Rebika H; Brémond-Gignac D;
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24388379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ketotifen fumarate and olopatadine hydrochloride in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis: a real-world comparison of efficacy and ocular comfort.
    Ganz M; Koll E; Gausche J; Detjen P; Orfan N
    Adv Ther; 2003; 20(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 12836808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative study between 0.025% ketotifen fumarate and 0.1% olopatadine hydrochloride in the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis].
    Hida WT; Nogueira DC; Schaefer A; Dantas PE; Dantas MC
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 17273679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the effects of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and olopatadine HCl 0.1% ophthalmic solutions in seasonal allergic conjunctivities: a 30-day, randomized, double-masked, artificial tear substitute-controlled trial.
    Avunduk AM; Tekelioglu Y; Turk A; Akyol N
    Clin Ther; 2005 Sep; 27(9):1392-402. PubMed ID: 16291412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of olopatadine HCI 0.1%, ketotifen fumarate 0.025%, epinastine HCI 0.05%, emedastine 0.05% and fluorometholone acetate 0.1% ophthalmic solutions for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a placebo-controlled environmental trial.
    Borazan M; Karalezli A; Akova YA; Akman A; Kiyici H; Erbek SS
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 87(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 18631332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
    Crampton HJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 12946545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Katelaris CH; Ciprandi G; Missotten L; Turner FD; Bertin D; Berdeaux G;
    Clin Ther; 2002 Oct; 24(10):1561-75. PubMed ID: 12462286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the relative efficacy and clinical performance of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
    Berdy GJ; Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy SS; Brusatti RC
    Clin Ther; 2000 Jul; 22(7):826-33. PubMed ID: 10945509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
    Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of 0.1% olopatadine hydrochloride and 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
    Yaylali V; Demirlenk I; Tatlipinar S; Ozbay D; Esme A; Yildirim C; Ozden S
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2003 Aug; 81(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 12859265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Abelson MB; Turner D
    Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine versus ketotifen ophthalmic solutions: a double-masked, environmental study of patient preference.
    Leonardi A; Zafirakis P
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1167-73. PubMed ID: 15324519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Greiner JV
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Allergic conjunctivitis and contact lenses: experience with olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% therapy.
    Brodsky M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (230):56-9. PubMed ID: 11057353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of olopatadin and ketotifen in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis].
    Varguez-Rodríguez ME; Hernández-López A; Gómez-Dávila Rde L
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2009; 47(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 20553645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
    Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
    Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.