These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11057354)

  • 1. An evaluation of onset and duration of action of patanol (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%) compared to Claritin (loratadine 10 mg) tablets in acute allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Welch DL
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (230):60-3. PubMed ID: 11057354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The added benefit of local Patanol therapy when combined with systemic Claritin for the inhibition of ocular itching in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Lanier RQ
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):53-6. PubMed ID: 10337434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
    Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
    Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Greiner JV
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and comfort of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Butrus S; Greiner JV; Discepola M; Finegold I
    Clin Ther; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1462-72. PubMed ID: 11192137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity.
    Abelson MB; Spitalny L
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 9645717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
    Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
    Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study of the mast cell-stabilizing effects of treatment with olopatadine in the conjunctival allergen challenge model in humans.
    Leonardi A; Abelson MB
    Clin Ther; 2003 Oct; 25(10):2539-52. PubMed ID: 14667955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
    Crampton HJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 12946545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Berdy GJ; Stoppel JO; Epstein AB
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jun; 24(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 12117082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Greiner JV; Udell IJ
    Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the onset and duration of effect of azelastine eye drops (0.05%) versus placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis using an allergen challenge model.
    Friedlaender MH; Harris J; LaVallee N; Russell H; Shilstone J
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Dec; 107(12):2152-7. PubMed ID: 11097587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the relative efficacy and clinical performance of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
    Berdy GJ; Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy SS; Brusatti RC
    Clin Ther; 2000 Jul; 22(7):826-33. PubMed ID: 10945509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Olopatadine ophthalmic solution adjunctive to loratadine compared with loratadine alone in patients with active seasonal allergic conjunctivitis symptoms.
    Lanier BQ; Gross RD; Marks BB; Cockrum PC; Juniper EF
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2001 Jun; 86(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11428736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preclinical and clinical antiallergic effect of olopatadine 0.2% solution 24 hours after topical ocular administration.
    Vogelson CT; Abelson MB; Pasquine T; Stephens DM; Gamache DA; Gross RD; Robertson SM; Yanni JM
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2004; 25(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 15055565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.