These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11057535)

  • 1. Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement.
    Wilke HJ; Kettler A; Claes L
    Eur Spine J; 2000 Oct; 9(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 11057535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Stabilizing effect and sintering tendency of 3 different cages and bone cement for fusion of cervical vertebrae segments].
    Wilke HJ; Kettler A; Claes L
    Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):472-80. PubMed ID: 12089797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage.
    Wilke HJ; Kettler A; Goetz C; Claes L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Nov; 25(21):2762-70. PubMed ID: 11064521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of neck movements on stability and subsidence in cervical interbody fusion: an in vitro study.
    Kettler A; Wilke HJ; Claes L
    J Neurosurg; 2001 Jan; 94(1 Suppl):97-107. PubMed ID: 11147875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Gumnior S; Turan O; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
    Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Schnake KJ; Haas NP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. PubMed ID: 15534403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro stabilizing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages.
    Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Kast E; Gottwald M; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(22):E665-70. PubMed ID: 16284577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experimental fusion of the sheep cervical spine. Part I: Effect of cage design on interbody fusion].
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schäfer J; Schollmeier G; Schnake KJ; Bail H; Duda G; Haas NP
    Chirurg; 2002 Sep; 73(9):909-17. PubMed ID: 12297957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine.
    Shimamoto N; Cunningham BW; Dmitriev AE; Minami A; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(19):E432-6. PubMed ID: 11698902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experimental fusion of the sheep cervical spine. Part II: Effect of growth factors and carrier systems on interbody fusion].
    Kandziora F; Scholz M; Pflugmacher R; Krummrey G; Schollmeier G; Schmidmaier G; Schnake KJ; Duda G; Raschke M; Haas NP
    Chirurg; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1025-38. PubMed ID: 12395162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. IGF-I and TGF-beta1 application by a poly-(D,L-lactide)-coated cage promotes intervertebral bone matrix formation in the sheep cervical spine.
    Kandziora F; Schmidmaier G; Schollmeier G; Bail H; Pflugmacher R; Görke T; Wagner M; Raschke M; Mittlmeier T; Haas NP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(16):1710-23. PubMed ID: 12195060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.
    Barsa P; Suchomel P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17221174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Dynamic Interbody Cage Improves Bone Formation in Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Porcine Biomechanical Study.
    Yang SH; Xiao FR; Lai DM; Wei CK; Tsuang FY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2547-2558. PubMed ID: 34343157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of bioabsorbable multiamino acid copolymer/α-tri-calcium phosphate interbody fusion cages in a goat model.
    Chunguang Z; Yueming S; Chongqi T; Hong D; Fuxing P; Yonggang Y; Hong L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1615-22. PubMed ID: 21270683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pilot study of a new acrylic cage in a dog cervical spine fusion model.
    Farrokhi MR; Torabinezhad S; Ghajar KA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 20087221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.
    Nayak AN; Stein MI; James CR; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Adu-Lartey M; Castellvi AE; Santoni BG
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3002-10. PubMed ID: 24948039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model.
    Kandziora F; Schollmeier G; Scholz M; Schaefer J; Scholz A; Schmidmaier G; Schröder R; Bail H; Duda G; Mittlmeier T; Haas NP
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Apr; 96(3 Suppl):321-32. PubMed ID: 11990842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.