BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11058972)

  • 1. An analysis of the readability and cultural sensitivity of information on the National Cancer Institute's Web site: CancerNet.
    Wilson FL; Baker LM; Brown-Syed C; Gollop C
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2000 Oct; 27(9):1403-9. PubMed ID: 11058972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web.
    Graber MA; Roller CM; Kaeble B
    J Fam Pract; 1999 Jan; 48(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 9934385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability and comprehensibility of patient education material in hand-related web sites.
    Wang SW; Capo JT; Orillaza N
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Sep; 34(7):1308-15. PubMed ID: 19596175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM; Volsko TA
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.
    Wilson M
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. PubMed ID: 19098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The invisibility of nursing: implications from an analysis of National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center web sites.
    Boyle DA
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2010 Mar; 37(2):E75-83. PubMed ID: 20189913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structure and content of chronic kidney disease information on the World Wide Web: barriers to public understanding of a pandemic.
    Calderón JL; Zadshir A; Norris K
    Nephrol News Issues; 2004 Oct; 18(11):76, 78-9, 81-4. PubMed ID: 15551616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A health literacy assessment of the National Epilepsy Foundation Web site.
    Elliott JO; Charyton C; Long L
    Epilepsy Behav; 2007 Dec; 11(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 17923440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MyPyramid.gov: assessment of literacy, cultural and linguistic factors in the USDA food pyramid web site.
    Neuhauser L; Rothschild R; Rodríguez FM
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2007; 39(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17606248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term evaluation of the CancerNet WWW service.
    Quade G; Far F; Püschel N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():327-31. PubMed ID: 10384473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials.
    Cooley ME; Moriarty H; Berger MS; Selm-Orr D; Coyle B; Short T
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1995 Oct; 22(9):1345-51. PubMed ID: 8539175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
    Thompson AE; Graydon SL
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Myelomeningocele information on the internet is accessible and of variable quality, and requires a high reading level.
    Bergman J; Konijeti R; Lerman SE
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability.
    Meade CD; Howser DM
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1992; 19(10):1523-8. PubMed ID: 1461766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of user input in shaping online information from the National Cancer Institute.
    Grama LM; Beckwith M; Bittinger W; Blais D; Lollar C; Middleswarth A; Noone M; Price D; Quint-Kasner S; Shields V; Wright LW
    J Med Internet Res; 2005 Jul; 7(3):e25. PubMed ID: 15998616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability levels of selected hypercholesterolemia patient education literature.
    Merritt SL; Gates MA; Skiba K
    Heart Lung; 1993; 22(5):415-20. PubMed ID: 8226005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Choudhry OJ; Liu JK; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Aug; 122(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22685030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research briefs reading grade level and readability of printed cancer education materials.
    Singh J
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2003; 30(5):867-70. PubMed ID: 12949600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of Internet audience measurement data to gauge market share for online health information services.
    Wood FB; Benson D; LaCroix EM; Siegel ER; Fariss S
    J Med Internet Res; 2005 Jul; 7(3):e31. PubMed ID: 15998622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.