These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. 2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. Osborne JW; Summitt JB Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 9545902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation and microstructural analysis of a direct placement gallium restorative alloy. Neo J; Chew CL; Osborne JW; Mahler DB J Dent; 2000 Feb; 28(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 10666970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical properties and clinical performance of a gallium restorative material. Osborne JW; Summitt JB Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):241-5. PubMed ID: 8710706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gallium restorative materials. McComb D J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Oct; 64(9):645-7. PubMed ID: 9812433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Gallium: an alternative for amalgam?]. Schuurs AH; Davidson CL Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Apr; 104(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 11924385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro corrosion behavior and microstructure examination of a gallium-based restorative. DeSchepper EJ; Oshida Y; Moore BK; Cook NB; Eggertson H Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):209-16. PubMed ID: 9484143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial. Shaini FJ; Shortall AC; Ellakwa AE; Marquis PM J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 11722719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. Kiremitci A; Bolay S J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 12787466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer. Gordan VV; Mjör IA Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 12413217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars. Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photoelastic assessment of the expansion of direct-placement gallium restorative alloys. Osborne JW Quintessence Int; 1999 Mar; 30(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 10356572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A comparative evaluation of the technological characteristics of working with metal-containing filling materials in the clinic]. Iankevich OV Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1997; 76(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 9471804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching adhesive on the reduction of postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations. Hajizadeh H; Akbari M; Ghavamnasiri M; Abedini S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):9-16. PubMed ID: 18997911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors associated with postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations. Al-Omari QD; Al-Omari WM; Omar R J Ir Dent Assoc; 2009; 55(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 19455848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy. Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]