118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11062366)
21. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Gonzalgo ML; Bastian PJ; Mangold LA; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Partin AW
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16413345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pathologic effects of neoadjuvant cyproterone acetate on nonneoplastic prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma: a detailed analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens from a randomized trial.
Bullock MJ; Srigley JR; Klotz LH; Goldenberg SL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2002 Nov; 26(11):1400-13. PubMed ID: 12409716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Correlation between Gleason score on prostate biopsies diagnostic of adenocarcinoma and radical prostatectomy specimens].
Montesino Semper M; Jiménez Aristu J; Repáraz Romero B; Ruiz Ramo M; Villanueva Pérez I; Hualde Alfaro A; Pinós Paul M; De Pablo Cárdenas A
Arch Esp Urol; 2004 Jun; 57(5):519-23. PubMed ID: 15382569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.
Bastian PJ; Gonzalgo ML; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Mangold LA; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Freedland SJ
Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prognostic significance of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of prostate cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant hormone treatment.
Köllermann J; Weikert S; Schostak M; Kempkensteffen C; Kleinschmidt K; Rau T; Pantel K
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 26(30):4928-33. PubMed ID: 18794550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.
Cheng L; Koch MO; Juliar BE; Daggy JK; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Gardner TA
J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(13):2911-7. PubMed ID: 15860849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does neoadjuvant hormone therapy improve outcome in prostate cancer patients receiving radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy?
Pai HH; Eldridge B; Bishop D; Alexander A; Lesperance M; Blood P; Lim J; Ludgate C
Can J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(2):4541-52. PubMed ID: 19364426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Role of early adjuvant hormonal therapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Zincke H; Lau W; Bergstralh E; Blute ML
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2208-15. PubMed ID: 11696737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Arora R; Koch MO; Eble JN; Ulbright TM; Li L; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(11):2362-6. PubMed ID: 15160339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer].
Miki T; Kamoi K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2001 Jul; 28(7):927-33. PubMed ID: 11478141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy.
Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Crispen PL; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Sebo TJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):95-104; discussion 104. PubMed ID: 19012937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables.
Lau WK; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML; Slezak JM; Zincke H
J Urol; 2002 Jan; 167(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 11743287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
