161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11062387)
1. Left in the dust of the campaign trail.
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1119. PubMed ID: 11062387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. EU plans to label and trace GMOs.
Dorey E
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):795. PubMed ID: 11533623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Chinese agribiotech: Against the grain.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):111-2. PubMed ID: 12634752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Precaution without principle.
Miller HI; Conko G
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):302-3. PubMed ID: 11283575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Italian GMO ban could spread.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1137-8. PubMed ID: 11062425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The 20-year African biotech plan.
Singh JA; Daar AS
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 18327231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Transgenic crops. China takes a bumpy road from the lab to the field.
Yimin D; Mervis J
Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5602):2317-9. PubMed ID: 12493892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. European Union in disarray over GM seeds.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 11923823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
Jayaraman KS
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Trace and traceability--a call for regulatory harmony.
Ramessar K; Capell T; Twyman RM; Quemada H; Christou P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 18779799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biotechnology. Monsanto pulls the plug on genetically modified wheat.
Stokstad E
Science; 2004 May; 304(5674):1088-9. PubMed ID: 15155915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Why technology-based regulations don't work.
Mayer S
Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Dec; 14(13):1630. PubMed ID: 9634831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New Zealand backs GM technologies.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):792. PubMed ID: 11533620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Canada. Monsanto wins split decision in patent fight over GM crop.
Kondro W
Science; 2004 May; 304(5675):1229. PubMed ID: 15166338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops.
Kalaitzandonakes N; Alston JM; Bradford KJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17483830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Auf Wiedersehen, agbiotech.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):974-5. PubMed ID: 18779798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Italian public votes out anti-GMO Greens.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jul; 19(7):603-4. PubMed ID: 11433259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Transgenic harvest.
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7316):633-4. PubMed ID: 20930796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
