161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11062387)
21. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
Smyth S; McHughen A
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. US agbio controversies continue.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Jul; 17(7):628. PubMed ID: 10409343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Intellectual property reform for genetically modified crops: a legal imperative.
López CS
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 20(2):367-434. PubMed ID: 15239363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Agbiotech goes further afield.
Lawrence S
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Apr; 24(4):379. PubMed ID: 16601710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Biotech regulation in India: problems and promises.
Reddy KI
Biotechnol J; 2009 Mar; 4(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 19296437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Socioeconomics and the protocol on biosafety.
Crompton T; Wakeford T
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):697-8. PubMed ID: 9702752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The status of GM rice R&D in China.
Wang Y; Johnston S
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):717-8. PubMed ID: 17621287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Report recommends ban of US GM maize in Mexico.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):6. PubMed ID: 15637599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Taking the hex off transgenic plant exports.
Hoyle R
Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Dec; 14(13):1628. PubMed ID: 9634830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Democratization is more than lower prices.
Cayford J
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):167; author reply 167. PubMed ID: 12855789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Plant science. China plans $3.5 billion GM crops initiative.
Stone R
Science; 2008 Sep; 321(5894):1279. PubMed ID: 18772402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Agbiotech booms in emerging nations.
Lawrence S
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 25(3):271. PubMed ID: 17344870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [The global status of the commercialized biotechnological/genetically modified crops: 2006].
Clive J
Tsitol Genet; 2007; 41(3):10-2. PubMed ID: 17649619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. UNEP "buys support for Cartagena," say critics.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Mar; 20(3):205. PubMed ID: 11875401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Taco dispute underscores need for standardized tests.
Dorey E
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1136-7. PubMed ID: 11062423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Italy performs GMO trial about-face.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):293. PubMed ID: 11283557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Caution in China over GM crops.
Niu C
Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1013. PubMed ID: 12586923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Plant biotechnology in China.
Huang J; Rozelle S; Pray C; Wang Q
Science; 2002 Jan; 295(5555):674-6. PubMed ID: 11809972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
