These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11062387)

  • 61. Conflicts around a study of Mexican crops.
    Worthy K; Strohman RC; Billings PR
    Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):897; author reply 897-8. PubMed ID: 12087377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Poverty and transgenic crops.
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):569. PubMed ID: 12167817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Critics of 'gene foods' report are avoiding the real issues.
    Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):689. PubMed ID: 10783853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe.
    Fleck B; Baldock C
    Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A little protectionism goes a long way.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):99. PubMed ID: 12634739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Electoral campaign delays resolution of biotech issues.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Oct; 22(10):1193. PubMed ID: 15470439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1619-20. PubMed ID: 11872806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. I'll be back.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Mar; 20(3):203. PubMed ID: 11875400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Agricultural research. Australia's new era for GM crops.
    Finkel E
    Science; 2008 Sep; 321(5896):1629. PubMed ID: 18801979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Trade war looms as US launches challenge over transgenic crops.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6938):369. PubMed ID: 12761507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Science, politics, and the GM debate in Europe.
    Tencalla F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Feb; 44(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16188360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Drugs in crops--the unpalatable truth.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):133. PubMed ID: 14755274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Homegrown common sense.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):891. PubMed ID: 11581635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Survey raises concerns about Bt resistance management.
    Dove A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):293-4. PubMed ID: 11283558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Concern about Japan's unclear biotech regulations.
    Watanabe KN
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Agricultural biotech: the rice squad.
    Surridge C
    Nature; 2002 Apr; 416(6881):576-8. PubMed ID: 11948321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. GM giants pair up to do battle.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):695-6. PubMed ID: 17621277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Vatican cheers GM.
    Meldolesi A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 27(3):214. PubMed ID: 19270656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.