These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11062585)

  • 21. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal prostheses tested in vitro.
    Joyce TI; Unsworth A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005; 219(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 15819481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can finite element models detect clinically inferior cemented hip implants?
    Stolk J; Maher SA; Verdonschot N; Prendergast PJ; Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Apr; (409):138-50. PubMed ID: 12671496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correlation between range of motion and implant fracture: a 5 year follow-up of 72 joints in 18 patients in a randomized study comparing Swanson and Avanta/Sutter MCP silicone prosthesis.
    Tägil M; Geijer M; Malcus P; Kopylov P
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 19786405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
    Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of ex vivo and in vitro Sutter metacarpophalangeal prostheses.
    Joyce TJ; Milner RH; Unsworth A
    J Hand Surg Br; 2003 Feb; 28(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 12531676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
    Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of the effects of different materials in a tooth implant-supported fixed prosthesis using finite element method.
    Dargahi J; Najarian S; Talebi M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(4):317-31. PubMed ID: 16010040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Avanta versus Swanson silicone implants in the MCP joint--a prospective, randomized comparison of 30 patients followed for 2 years.
    Möller K; Sollerman C; Geijer M; Kopylov P; Tägil M
    J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 30(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 15620485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
    Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of the mechanism of fracture of silicone metacarpophalangeal prostheses.
    Joyce TJ
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Feb; 34(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 18936133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.