274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11063239)
1. Effect of a single-channel wide dynamic range compression circuit on perception of stop consonant place of articulation.
Hedrick MS; Rice T
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1174-84. PubMed ID: 11063239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual weighting of relative amplitude and formant transition cues in aided CV syllables.
Hedrick M; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Oct; 44(5):964-74. PubMed ID: 11708536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
Souza PE; Bishop RD
Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10613384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using multichannel wide-dynamic range compression in severely hearing-impaired listeners: effects on speech recognition and quality.
Souza PE; Jenstad LM; Folino R
Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 15809540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Older listeners' use of temporal cues altered by compression amplification.
Souza PE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):661-74. PubMed ID: 10877436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates.
Hedrick M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):925-38. PubMed ID: 9263955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants.
Hedrick MS; Carney AE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1445-57. PubMed ID: 9430763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using a vocoder-based frequency-lowering method and spectral enhancement to improve place-of-articulation perception for hearing-impaired listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 23165224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech.
Souza PE; Turner CW
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 10037062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment.
Reinhart PN; Souza PE; Srinivasan NK; Gallun FJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 26462171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.
Woods DL; Arbogast T; Doss Z; Younus M; Herron TJ; Yund EW
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0114922. PubMed ID: 25730423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amplification and consonant modulation spectra.
Souza P; Gallun F
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 20071993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of consonant-vowel amplitude ratio in the recognition of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with hearing impairment.
Sammeth CA; Dorman MF; Stearns CJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 10025542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Hedrick MS; Jesteadt W
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3398-407. PubMed ID: 8914319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
Dubno JR; Dirks DD
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75. PubMed ID: 2708682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
