These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Models of multilocus recombination: nonrandomness in chiasma number and crossover positions. Goldgar DE; Fain PR Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Jul; 43(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 3163889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct evidence for crossover and chromatid interference in meiosis of two plant hybrids (Lolium multiflorum×Festuca pratensis and Allium cepa×A. roylei). Ferreira MTM; Glombik M; Perničková K; Duchoslav M; Scholten O; Karafiátová M; Techio VH; Doležel J; Lukaszewski AJ; Kopecký D J Exp Bot; 2021 Feb; 72(2):254-267. PubMed ID: 33029645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical analysis of crossover interference using the chi-square model. Zhao H; Speed TP; McPeek MS Genetics; 1995 Feb; 139(2):1045-56. PubMed ID: 7713407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A test of a counting model for chiasma interference. Foss EJ; Stahl FW Genetics; 1995 Mar; 139(3):1201-9. PubMed ID: 7768433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comments on lack of interference in the four strand model of crossing over. Lange K; Risch N J Math Biol; 1977 Dec; 5(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 753907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A model of chiasma reduction of closely formed crossovers. Nilsson NO; Säll T J Theor Biol; 1995 Mar; 173(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 7739215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical analysis of multilocus recombination. Risch N; Lange K Biometrics; 1983 Dec; 39(4):949-63. PubMed ID: 6231060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of recombination and MLH1 foci density along mouse chromosomes: modeling effects of interference and obligate chiasma. Falque M; Mercier R; Mézard C; de Vienne D; Martin OC Genetics; 2007 Jul; 176(3):1453-67. PubMed ID: 17483430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between chromatid interference and the mapping function. Sturt E; Smith CA Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1976; 17(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 1001028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chiasma distribution, genetic lengths, and recombination fractions: a comparison between chromosomes 15 and 16. Saadallah N; Hultén M J Med Genet; 1983 Aug; 20(4):290-9. PubMed ID: 6620330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative efficiencies of chi 2 models of recombination for exclusion mapping and gene ordering. Goldstein DR; Zhao H; Speed TP Genomics; 1995 May; 27(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 7557991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of genetic interference: simulation studies and mouse data. Weeks DE; Ott J; Lathrop GM Genetics; 1994 Mar; 136(3):1217-26. PubMed ID: 8005426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorporating crossover interference into pedigree analysis using the chi 2 model. Lin S; Speed TP Hum Hered; 1996; 46(6):315-22. PubMed ID: 8956027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use and limitations of chiasma scoring with reference to human genetic mapping. Hultén M; Luciani JM; Kirton V; Devictor-Vuillet M Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1978; 22(1-6):37-58. PubMed ID: 752505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissecting meiotic recombination based on tetrad analysis by single-microspore sequencing in maize. Li X; Li L; Yan J Nat Commun; 2015 Mar; 6():6648. PubMed ID: 25800954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic crossover interference in the human genome. Lin S; Cheng R; Wright FA Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Jan; 65(Pt 1):79-93. PubMed ID: 11415524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]