BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11064014)

  • 1. Decision-directed hysterectomy: a possible approach to improve medical and economic outcomes.
    Kovac SR
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Nov; 71(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 11064014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.
    Kovac SR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7800317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications.
    Kovac SR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):787-93. PubMed ID: 10831967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy: a statistical model for determining physician decision making and patient outcome.
    Kovac SR; Christie SJ; Bindbeutel GA
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 2034070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital.
    Johns DA; Carrera B; Jones J; DeLeon F; Vincent R; Safely C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1709-15; discussion 1715-9. PubMed ID: 7778623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population.
    Kovac SR; Barhan S; Lister M; Tucker L; Bishop M; Das A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 187(6):1521-7. PubMed ID: 12501056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Total hysterectomy for benign pathologies: why is laparoscopy of value?].
    Chapron C; Aubert V; Dubuisson JB
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1995 Nov; 23(11):688-93. PubMed ID: 8520652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SOGC clinical guidelines. Hysterectomy.
    Lefebvre G; Allaire C; Jeffrey J; Vilos G; Arneja J; Birch C; Fortier M;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Jan; 24(1):37-61; quiz 74-6. PubMed ID: 12196887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.
    Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach.
    Kovac SR
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 57(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 24351441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
    Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy: peri- and post-operative outcome.
    Dawood NS; Mahmood R; Haseeb N
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2009; 21(4):116-20. PubMed ID: 21067042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Baekelandt J; De Mulder PA; Le Roy I; Mathieu C; Laenen A; Enzlin P; Weyers S; Mol BW; Bosteels JJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():6-15. PubMed ID: 27880893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of GnRH agonist before hysterectomy: a cost simulation.
    Bradham DD; Stovall TG; Thompson CD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 85(3):401-6. PubMed ID: 7862380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In Search for the Best Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approach for the Large Uterus: A Review.
    Kho RM; Abrão MS
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 60(2):286-295. PubMed ID: 28319474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subtotal versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy: could women sexual function recovery overcome the surgical outcomes in pre-operatory decision making?
    Saccardi C; Gizzo S; Noventa M; Quaranta M; Borgato S; Conte L; Pluchino N; Litta P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25501834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Howard FM; Sanchez R
    J Gynecol Surg; 1993; 9(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 10171971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Hysterectomy for benign lesions in Brittany: analysis of medical practices].
    Levêque J; Eon Y; Colladon B; Foucher F; Chaperon D; Grall JY; Taillanter L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Feb; 29(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10675832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Hysterectomy for benign lesions in the north of France: epidemiology and postoperative events].
    Debodinance P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Apr; 30(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 11319467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.