238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11064645)
1. Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ?
Dinkel HP; Gassel AM; Tschammler A
Br J Radiol; 2000 Sep; 73(873):938-44. PubMed ID: 11064645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Holland R; Hendriks JH
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic pattern of microcalcifications in the preoperative diagnosis of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathologic correlation.
Hermann G; Keller RJ; Drossman S; Caravella BA; Tartter P; Panetta RA; Bleiweiss IJ
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Aug; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 10459309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations.
Barreau B; de Mascarel I; Feuga C; MacGrogan G; Dilhuydy MH; Picot V; Dilhuydy JM; de Lara CT; Bussières E; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15797293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS.
Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between mammographic manifestations and averaged histopathologic nuclear grade using prognosis-predict scoring system for the prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lee KS; Han BH; Chun YK; Kim HS; Kim EE
Clin Imaging; 1999; 23(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10899414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases.
Farshid G; Sullivan T; Downey P; Gill PG; Pieterse S
Br J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 105(11):1669-75. PubMed ID: 22052156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chemotherapy may eradicate ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) but not the associated microcalcifications.
Goldberg H; Zandbank J; Kent V; Leonov-Polak M; Livoff A; Chernihovsky A; Guindy M; Evron E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1415-1420. PubMed ID: 28526187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microcalcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: histochemical and immunohistochemical study.
Foschini MP; Fornelli A; Peterse JL; Mignani S; Eusebi V
Hum Pathol; 1996 Feb; 27(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 8617460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association Between BI-RADS Calcification Descriptors and Recurrence Risk as Assessed by the Oncotype DX Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Score.
Woodard GA; Price ER
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):919-924. PubMed ID: 30714832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL; Meyer JE; Harris JR
Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 2544922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by image analysis of calcifications from digital mammograms.
Parker J; Dance DR; Davies DH; Yeoman LJ; Michell MJ; Humphreys S
Br J Radiol; 1995 Feb; 68(806):150-9. PubMed ID: 7735745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast microcalcifications: the UK RCR 5-point breast imaging system or BI-RADS; which is the better predictor of malignancy?
Metaxa L; Healy NA; O'Keeffe SA
Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190177. PubMed ID: 31365279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is There Any Association Between Mammographic Features of Microcalcifications and Breast Cancer Subtypes in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?
Avdan Aslan A; Gültekin S; Esendağli Yilmaz G; Kurukahvecioğlu O
Acad Radiol; 2021 Jul; 28(7):963-968. PubMed ID: 32620528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype.
Slanetz PJ; Giardino AA; Oyama T; Koerner FC; Halpern EF; Moore RH; Kopans DB
Breast J; 2001; 7(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 11843854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening.
Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consistency achieved by 23 European pathologists in categorizing ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using five classifications. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology.
Sloane JP; Amendoeira I; Apostolikas N; Bellocq JP; Bianchi S; Boecker W; Bussolati G; Coleman D; Connolly CE; Dervan P; Eusebi V; De Miguel C; Drijkoningen M; Elston CW; Faverley D; Gad A; Jacquemier J; Lacerda M; Martinez-Penuela J; Munt C; Peterse JL; Rank F; Sylvan M; Tsakraklides V; Zafrani B
Hum Pathol; 1998 Oct; 29(10):1056-62. PubMed ID: 9781641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
