132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11064649)
1. Digital selenium radiography: anti-scatter grid for chest radiography in a clinical study.
Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Hausmann T; Reichel G; Krause UW; Doehring W
Br J Radiol; 2000 Sep; 73(873):963-8. PubMed ID: 11064649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical evaluation of a digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):264-70. PubMed ID: 7892483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ITERATIVE SCATTER CORRECTION FOR GRID-LESS BEDSIDE CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: PERFORMANCE FOR A CHEST PHANTOM.
Mentrup D; Jockel S; Menser B; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Examination for Effectiveness of Scatter Correction in Portable Chest Radiography].
Ichikawa H; Ono T; Sawane Y; Terabe M; Yamaguchi M; Shimada H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 72(12):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 28003607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of scatter fractions in erect posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography.
Jordan LK; Floyd CE; Lo JY; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1993 Jul; 188(1):215-8. PubMed ID: 8511301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pediatric air-gap chest digital imaging: an experimental study.
Kuhns LR; Kottamasu SR
Pediatr Radiol; 1995 Nov; 25 Suppl 1():S199-201. PubMed ID: 8577526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observer evaluation of scatter subtraction for digital portable chest radiographs.
Baker JA; Floyd CE; Lo JY; Ravin CE
Invest Radiol; 1993 Aug; 28(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 8375997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of antiscatter grids in digital radiography. A phantom study.
Shaw CC; Wang T; Gur D
Invest Radiol; 1994 Jun; 29(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 8088973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital selenium radiography: detection of subtle pulmonary lesions on images acquired with and without an additional antiscatter grid.
Otto D; Ludwig K; Fessel A; Bernhardt TM; Kästner A; Reissberg S; Döhring W
Eur J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 36(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 11116175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
