BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11065032)

  • 1. A randomised controlled trial comparing birthing centre care with delivery suite care in Adelaide, Australia.
    Byrne JP; Crowther CA; Moss JR
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Aug; 40(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 11065032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Birth centre or labour ward? A comparison of the clinical outcomes of low-risk women in a NSW hospital.
    Homer C; Davis G; Petocz P; Barclay L; Matha D; Chapman M
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000; 18(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11878364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulated home delivery in hospital: a randomised controlled trial.
    MacVicar J; Dobbie G; Owen-Johnstone L; Jagger C; Hopkins M; Kennedy J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Apr; 100(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 8494832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Stockholm birth centre trial: maternal and infant outcome.
    Waldenström U; Nilsson CA; Winbladh B
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Apr; 104(4):410-8. PubMed ID: 9141576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.
    Burns EE; Boulton MG; Cluett E; Cornelius VR; Smith LA
    Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 23281901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternity care outcomes: assessing a nursing model of care for low-risk pregnancy.
    Stone PW
    Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1998; 2(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9582819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring cost and quality: community-based versus traditional hospital delivery systems.
    Walker PH; Stone PW
    J Health Care Finance; 1996; 23(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 8889977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic analysis of two models of low-risk maternity care: a freestanding birth center compared to traditional care.
    Stone PW; Zwanziger J; Hinton Walker P; Buenting J
    Res Nurs Health; 2000 Aug; 23(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10940953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in optimality index between planned place of birth in a birth centre and alternative planned places of birth, a nationwide prospective cohort study in The Netherlands: results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.
    Hermus MAA; Hitzert M; Boesveld IC; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Dommelen PV; Franx A; Graaf JP; Lith JMMV; Luurssen-Masurel N; Steegers EAP; Wiegers TA; Bruin KMVP
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e016958. PubMed ID: 29150465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications.
    Schroeder L; Patel N; Keeler M; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Macfarlane AJ
    Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():28-35. PubMed ID: 27984773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Women's satisfaction with birth center care: a randomized, controlled study.
    Waldenström U; Nilsson CA
    Birth; 1993 Mar; 20(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 8503964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Birth centers. Economy, safety, and empowerment.
    Spitzer MC
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1995; 40(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 7674056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
    Christensen LF; Overgaard C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Models of antenatal care and obstetric outcomes in Sydney South West.
    Bai J; Gyaneshwar R; Bauman A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):454-61. PubMed ID: 19032659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Birthing in South Africa.
    Jenkins LB
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2009; (89):32. PubMed ID: 19397156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the birthing environment (Part 2).
    Haines A; Kimber L
    Pract Midwife; 2005 Feb; 8(2):25-7. PubMed ID: 15739612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative analysis of newborn outcome in a hospital-based birthing center.
    Waskerwitz S; Fournier L; Jones P; Meier W
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1985 May; 24(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 3987167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of the birthing room environment on vaginal births and client-centred outcomes for women at term planning a vaginal birth: BE-UP, a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Ayerle GM; Schäfers R; Mattern E; Striebich S; Haastert B; Vomhof M; Icks A; Ronniger Y; Seliger G
    Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):641. PubMed ID: 30454075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Satisfaction with a modified form of in-hospital birth center care compared with standard maternity care.
    Tingstig C; Gottvall K; Grunewald C; Waldenström U
    Birth; 2012 Jun; 39(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 23281858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of planned birth in a birth centre compared with alternative planned places of birth: results of the Dutch Birth Centre study.
    Hitzert M; Hermus MM; Boesveld II; Franx A; van der Pal-de Bruin KK; Steegers EE; van den Akker-van Marle EM
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016960. PubMed ID: 28893750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.