216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11065310)
1. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences with a differing number of arguments: a comparison of English and Japanese speakers.
Nagata H; Bain B
Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 11065310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese bitransitive sentences with a differing number of arguments.
Nagata H
Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Jun; 92(3 Pt 2):993-1001. PubMed ID: 11565943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences violating the principle of full interpretation: a further exploration.
Nagata H
Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):477-82. PubMed ID: 14620235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese sentences lacking an argument or an adjunct.
Nagata H
Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1259-66. PubMed ID: 12578269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese simple sentences involving two arguments in a whole-part relation: a further examination of Chomsky's principle of Full Interpretation.
Nagata H
Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Jun; 102(3):855-70. PubMed ID: 16916165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese sentences violating the principle of full interpretation.
Nagata H
J Psycholinguist Res; 2003 Nov; 32(6):693-709. PubMed ID: 14653014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Faulty Japanese sentences are judged more grammatical when punctuation is used: negative implications for Chomsky's principle of Full Interpretation.
Nagata H
Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Aug; 99(1):325-36. PubMed ID: 15446660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is Syntax Semantically Constrained? Evidence From a Grammaticality Judgment Study of Indonesian.
Aryawibawa IN; Ambridge B
Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):3135-3148. PubMed ID: 30375023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The crosslinguistic acquisition of sentence structure: Computational modeling and grammaticality judgments from adult and child speakers of English, Japanese, Hindi, Hebrew and K'iche'.
Ambridge B; Maitreyee R; Tatsumi T; Doherty L; Zicherman S; Pedro PM; Bannard C; Samanta S; McCauley S; Arnon I; Bekman D; Efrati A; Berman R; Narasimhan B; Sharma DM; Nair RB; Fukumura K; Campbell S; Pye C; Pixabaj SFC; Pelíz MM; Mendoza MJ
Cognition; 2020 Sep; 202():104310. PubMed ID: 32623135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of word transpositions on grammaticality judgements in first and second language sentence reading.
Tiffin-Richards SP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):204-216. PubMed ID: 36847472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speakers' knowledge of word meanings: stable and perfect?
Nagata H
Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):427-34. PubMed ID: 14620229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct Versus Indirect Causation as a Semantic Linguistic Universal: Using a Computational Model of English, Hebrew, Hindi, Japanese, and K'iche' Mayan to Predict Grammaticality Judgments in Balinese.
Aryawibawa IN; Qomariana Y; Artawa K; Ambridge B
Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12974. PubMed ID: 33877699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attention, working memory, and grammaticality judgment in typical young adults.
Smith PA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):918-31. PubMed ID: 21106695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using instruments to understand argument structure: Evidence for gradient representation.
Rissman L; Rawlins K; Landau B
Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():266-90. PubMed ID: 26057832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grammaticality judgment in aphasia: deficits are not specific to syntactic structures, aphasic syndromes, or lesion sites.
Wilson SM; Saygin AP
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):238-52. PubMed ID: 15068594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sentence comprehension in Swahili-English bilingual agrammatic speakers.
Abuom TO; Shah E; Bastiaanse R
Clin Linguist Phon; 2013 May; 27(5):355-70. PubMed ID: 23635336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Language, thought, and real nouns.
Barner D; Inagaki S; Li P
Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):329-44. PubMed ID: 19345937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Processing Double-Embedded Relative Clauses: Working-Memory Constraints or Language Statistics?
Frank SL; Trompenaars T; Vasishth S
Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):554-78. PubMed ID: 25943302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Judgements about double-embedded relative clauses differ between languages.
Frank SL; Ernst P
Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1581-1593. PubMed ID: 29687232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of priming in grammatical acceptability judgements for native versus non-native speakers: Effects of intelligibility.
Constantine RR; Getty DJ; Fraundorf SH
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275191. PubMed ID: 36170327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
