These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11066152)

  • 1. Relation of surgical volume to outcome.
    Birkmeyer JD
    Ann Surg; 2000 Nov; 232(5):724-5. PubMed ID: 11066152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Khuri SF; Daley J; Henderson W; Hur K; Hossain M; Soybel D; Kizer KW; Aust JB; Bell RH; Chong V; Demakis J; Fabri PJ; Gibbs JO; Grover F; Hammermeister K; McDonald G; Passaro E; Phillips L; Scamman F; Spencer J; Stremple JF
    Ann Surg; 1999 Sep; 230(3):414-29; discussion 429-32. PubMed ID: 10493488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using a composite readmission measure to assess surgical quality in the Veterans Health Administration: how well does it correlate with established surgical measures?
    Chen Q; Tsai TC; Mull HJ; Rosen AK; Itani KM
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Nov; 149(11):1206-7. PubMed ID: 25207493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Khuri SF; Daley J; Henderson W; Hur K; Demakis J; Aust JB; Chong V; Fabri PJ; Gibbs JO; Grover F; Hammermeister K; Irvin G; McDonald G; Passaro E; Phillips L; Scamman F; Spencer J; Stremple JF
    Ann Surg; 1998 Oct; 228(4):491-507. PubMed ID: 9790339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. VA studies patient outcomes and best practices in surgery.
    OR Manager; 1998 Mar; 14(3):1, 29-30. PubMed ID: 10177901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The right stuff: Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.
    Lagasse RS
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Dec; 107(6):1772-4. PubMed ID: 19020116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring surgical quality: which measure should we trust?
    Mull HJ; Chen Q; Shwartz M; Itani KM; Rosen AK
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Nov; 149(11):1210-2. PubMed ID: 25250973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fifteen years of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in review.
    Itani KM
    Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S9-S18. PubMed ID: 19874939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complications and Failure to Rescue After Inpatient Noncardiac Surgery in the Veterans Affairs Health System.
    Massarweh NN; Kougias P; Wilson MA
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Dec; 151(12):1157-1165. PubMed ID: 27653498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of quality of surgical care between the US Department of Veterans Affairs and the private sector.
    Matula SR; Trivedi AN; Miake-Lye I; Glassman PA; Shekelle P; Asch S
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):823-32. PubMed ID: 21109159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: chart review of process of care.
    Gibbs J; Clark K; Khuri S; Henderson W; Hur K; Daley J
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2001 Jun; 13(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 11476143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The volume-outcome relationship: busier hospitals are indeed better, but why?
    Wang L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 May; 95(10):700-2. PubMed ID: 12759379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the quality of surgical care: a reason for caution.
    Chu D; Berger DH; Bakaeen FG
    J Am Coll Surg; 2011 May; 212(5):907-8; author reply 908-9. PubMed ID: 21530848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach.
    Ingraham AM; Richards KE; Hall BL; Ko CY
    Adv Surg; 2010; 44():251-67. PubMed ID: 20919525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study.
    Khuri SF; Daley J; Henderson W; Hur K; Gibbs JO; Barbour G; Demakis J; Irvin G; Stremple JF; Grover F; McDonald G; Passaro E; Fabri PJ; Spencer J; Hammermeister K; Aust JB
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Oct; 185(4):315-27. PubMed ID: 9328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP).
    Massarweh NN; Kaji AH; Itani KMF
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Aug; 153(8):768-769. PubMed ID: 29617543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study.
    Daley J; Khuri SF; Henderson W; Hur K; Gibbs JO; Barbour G; Demakis J; Irvin G; Stremple JF; Grover F; McDonald G; Passaro E; Fabri PJ; Spencer J; Hammermeister K; Aust JB; Oprian C
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Oct; 185(4):328-40. PubMed ID: 9328381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance measurement. It's all about "team-ness".
    Strateg Healthc Excell; 1998 Aug; 11(8):6-10. PubMed ID: 10185073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [High-risk surgery should not be performed in hospitals with low surgical volume].
    Haglund U; Ihse I; Mellbring G
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Aug; 101(32-33):2494-5. PubMed ID: 15346624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Will volume-based referral strategies reduce costs or just save lives?
    Birkmeyer JD; Skinner JS; Wennberg DE
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2002; 21(5):234-41. PubMed ID: 12224888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.