These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11066654)

  • 1. ACG case-mix system aids contract assessment, improves performance.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2000 Feb; 4(2):21-6. PubMed ID: 11066654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient based 'burden-of-illness' in Swedish primary health care. Applying the Johns Hopkins ACG case-mix system in a retrospective study of electronic patient records.
    Carlsson L; Börjesson U; Edgren L
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2002; 17(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 12298147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applying population-based case mix adjustment in managed care: the Johns Hopkins Ambulatory Care Group system.
    Smith NS; Weiner JP
    Manag Care Q; 1994; 2(3):21-34. PubMed ID: 10136807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The need for alternatives to capitation under managed care.
    Kelly WP; Miller HC; Parciak T
    Manag Care Q; 1994; 2(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 10136808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Johns Hopkins Ambulatory Care Groups (ACGs). A case-mix system for UR, QA and capitation adjustment.
    Weiner JP; Starfield BH; Lieberman RN
    HMO Pract; 1992 Mar; 6(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 10119658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs): a classification system for risk-adjusted capitation-based payment and health care management.
    Hughes JS; Averill RF; Eisenhandler J; Goldfield NI; Muldoon J; Neff JM; Gay JC
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 14713742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Payment and provider profiling of episodes of illness of clinical illnesses involving rehabilitation.
    Goldfield N; Averill R; Eisenhandler J
    J Outcome Meas; 2000-2001; 4(3):706-20. PubMed ID: 11253904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive modeling, integrated DM emerge as popular strategies.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 2002 Jan; 6(1):10-5, 1. PubMed ID: 11842630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Case mix, risk adjustment, reinsurance, and health reform.
    Goldfield N
    Manag Care Q; 1994; 2(3):iv-viii. PubMed ID: 10136804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dynamic of the outpatient prospective payment system within the hospital setting.
    Thevnin C
    J Health Care Finance; 2000; 27(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 11140549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting resource utilization in a Veterans Health Administration primary care population: comparison of methods based on diagnoses and medications.
    Wahls TL; Barnett MJ; Rosenthal GE
    Med Care; 2004 Feb; 42(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 14734949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.
    Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA
    Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.
    Ettner SL; Frank RG; McGuire TG; Hermann RC
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Aug; 36(4):793-811. PubMed ID: 11508640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ambulatory Patient Groups, Version 3.0--a classification system for payment of ambulatory visits.
    Goldfield N; Averill R; Eisenhandler J; Grant T
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 18162790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Period of adjustment. Health plans experiment with new clinical risk adjustment strategies.
    Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1998 Dec; 7(12):1-6. PubMed ID: 10345546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the predictive validity of diagnosis-based risk adjusters for clinical outcomes.
    Petersen LA; Pietz K; Woodard LD; Byrne M
    Med Care; 2005 Jan; 43(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 15626935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managed care and HIV.
    Soloway B; Hecht FM
    AIDS Clin Care; 1997 Sep; 9(9):67-9, 71. PubMed ID: 11364754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fixing capitation's flaws: a view from the trenches.
    Capitation Manag Rep; 2000 Nov; 7(11):168-72. PubMed ID: 11188278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of a risk-adjusted capitation payment system: the Maryland Medicaid model.
    Weiner JP; Tucker AM; Collins AM; Fakhraei H; Lieberman R; Abrams C; Trapnell GR; Folkemer JG
    J Ambul Care Manage; 1998 Oct; 21(4):29-52. PubMed ID: 10387436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using knowledge of multiple levels of variation in care to target performance incentives to providers.
    Turenne MN; Hirth RA; Pan Q; Wolfe RA; Messana JM; Wheeler JR
    Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 18219239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.