204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11066881)
1. The Supreme Court confronts HIV: reflections on Bragdon v. Abbott.
Parmet WE
J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):225-40, 179. PubMed ID: 11066881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protecting patients from discrimination--the Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV infection.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Oct; 339(17):1255-9. PubMed ID: 9780348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Disability discrimination in America: HIV/AIDS and other health conditions.
Gostin LO; Feldblum C; Webber DW
JAMA; 1999 Feb; 281(8):745-52. PubMed ID: 10052447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bragdon v. Abbott: the Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV infection.
Tessman I
N Engl J Med; 1999 Apr; 340(15):1212-3; author reply 1213-4. PubMed ID: 10206849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is HIV a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act: unanswered questions after Bragdon v. Abbott.
Mayer C
J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(2):179-208. PubMed ID: 11499156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. HIV, the ADA, and the duty to treat.
Shepherd L
Houst Law Rev; 2000; 37(4):1055-100. PubMed ID: 12071219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health care professionals and treatment of HIV-positive patients. Is there an affirmative duty to treat under common law, the Rehabilitation Act, or the Americans with Disabilities Act?
White CC
J Leg Med; 1999 Mar; 20(1):67-113. PubMed ID: 10230151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bragdon v. Abbott, asymptomatic genetic conditions, and antidiscrimination law: a conservative perspective.
Clegg R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):409-29. PubMed ID: 15015487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abbott v. Bragdon.
United States. Court of Appeals. First Circuit
Fed Report; 1997; 107():934-49. PubMed ID: 17225350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic discrimination: why Bragdon does not ensure protection.
Rothstein LF
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):330-51. PubMed ID: 15015483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. HIV is a disability: court protects HIV-positive people.
Engle L
Body Posit; 1998 Jul; 11(7):32-3. PubMed ID: 11365615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Your health is back. Now you may lose your protection against discrimination.
Jurgens R
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Newsl; 1997-1998 Winter; 3-4(4-1):3-6. PubMed ID: 11365290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bragdon v. Abbott.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1998 Jun; 118():2196-218. PubMed ID: 12041286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bragdon v. Abbott.
Liang B; Robinson W; Truog RD
J Clin Anesth; 1999 Sep; 11(6):494-8. PubMed ID: 10526830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bragdon vs Abbott: US Supreme Court set to re-examine HIV as a disability.
Zuniga J
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care; 1998 May; 4(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 11365189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court confronts AIDS: expanded coverage.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Jul; 13(13):1, 3-10. PubMed ID: 11365574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. School Board of Nassau County, Florida v. Arline.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1987 Mar; 107():1123-34. PubMed ID: 12041292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How will the court rule in Bragdon? It's anyone's guess.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Dec; 12(22):12-5. PubMed ID: 11364894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bragdon v. Abbott: who's in? Who's out?
Davis DS
AIDS Public Policy J; 1998; 13(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 10915277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. May a dentist refuse to treat an HIV-positive patient?
Welie JV
Med Health Care Philos; 1998; 1(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 11081293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
