189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11067601)
1. Informed consent and the refusal of medical treatment in the correctional setting.
Parker FR; Paine CJ
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(3):240-51, 210. PubMed ID: 11067601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decoding right to refuse treatment law.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1993; 16(1-2):151-77. PubMed ID: 8099069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
Rossiter GP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical and legal responses to patients who refuse consent to treatment.
Jones MA
Br J Urol; 1995 Nov; 76 Suppl 2():9-14. PubMed ID: 8535763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rationality and the refusal of medical treatment: a critique of the recent approach of the English courts.
Stauch M
J Med Ethics; 1995 Jun; 21(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 7674281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical, legal, and psychiatric issues in capacity, competency, and informed consent: an annotated bibliography.
Zaubler TS; Viederman M; Fins JJ
Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 1996 May; 18(3):155-72. PubMed ID: 8739009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Advance directives in a correctional setting.
Thomas DL; Watson JM
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New hearing on forced medication of inmate.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A30. PubMed ID: 11646793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a pure best interests model of proxy decision making for incompetent psychiatric patients.
McCubbin M; Weisstub DN
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 9526712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The retreat from Gillick.
Douglas G
Mod Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 55(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 16977738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can a patient refuse a psychiatric consultation to evaluate decision-making capacity?
Wenger NS; Halpern J
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 7841473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness.
Winick BJ
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 51(1):57-95. PubMed ID: 11660621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Religious issues in the capacity evaluation.
Waldfogel S; Meadows S
Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 1996 May; 18(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 8739010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy.
Furrow BR
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1984; 19(1):21-60. PubMed ID: 11658667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Consent and capacity in psychiatric practice revisited.
McClelland R; Szmukler G
Eur J Health Law; 2000 Mar; 7(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 12542025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Consent and the mentally disordered detained patient.
Dimond B
Br J Nurs; 2003 Dec 11-2004 Jan 7; 12(22):1331-4. PubMed ID: 14688654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The US Supreme Court looks at voluntariness and consent.
Miller RD
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 7995684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: balancing considerations of autonomy and protection.
Ellis JW
Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1779-809. PubMed ID: 11654415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
