These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11067601)

  • 1. Informed consent and the refusal of medical treatment in the correctional setting.
    Parker FR; Paine CJ
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(3):240-51, 210. PubMed ID: 11067601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decoding right to refuse treatment law.
    Perlin ML
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1993; 16(1-2):151-77. PubMed ID: 8099069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical and legal responses to patients who refuse consent to treatment.
    Jones MA
    Br J Urol; 1995 Nov; 76 Suppl 2():9-14. PubMed ID: 8535763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rationality and the refusal of medical treatment: a critique of the recent approach of the English courts.
    Stauch M
    J Med Ethics; 1995 Jun; 21(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 7674281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical, legal, and psychiatric issues in capacity, competency, and informed consent: an annotated bibliography.
    Zaubler TS; Viederman M; Fins JJ
    Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 1996 May; 18(3):155-72. PubMed ID: 8739009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advance directives in a correctional setting.
    Thomas DL; Watson JM
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New hearing on forced medication of inmate.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A30. PubMed ID: 11646793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward a pure best interests model of proxy decision making for incompetent psychiatric patients.
    McCubbin M; Weisstub DN
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 9526712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The retreat from Gillick.
    Douglas G
    Mod Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 55(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 16977738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can a patient refuse a psychiatric consultation to evaluate decision-making capacity?
    Wenger NS; Halpern J
    J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 7841473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness.
    Winick BJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 51(1):57-95. PubMed ID: 11660621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Religious issues in the capacity evaluation.
    Waldfogel S; Meadows S
    Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 1996 May; 18(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 8739010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy.
    Furrow BR
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1984; 19(1):21-60. PubMed ID: 11658667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consent and capacity in psychiatric practice revisited.
    McClelland R; Szmukler G
    Eur J Health Law; 2000 Mar; 7(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 12542025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consent and the mentally disordered detained patient.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2003 Dec 11-2004 Jan 7; 12(22):1331-4. PubMed ID: 14688654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The US Supreme Court looks at voluntariness and consent.
    Miller RD
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 7995684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: balancing considerations of autonomy and protection.
    Ellis JW
    Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1779-809. PubMed ID: 11654415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.