249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11068287)
1. Benign prostatic glands at surgical margins of radical prostatectomy specimens: frequency and associated risk factors.
Shah R; Bassily N; Wei J; Mucci NR; Montie JE; Sanda MG; Rubin MA
Urology; 2000 Nov; 56(5):721-5. PubMed ID: 11068287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The presence of benign prostatic glandular tissue at surgical margins does not predict PSA recurrence.
Kernek KM; Koch MO; Daggy JK; Juliar BE; Cheng L
J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):725-8. PubMed ID: 15976340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Residual prostatic tumour in the surgical bed following radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: possible prognostic significance.
Valotto C; Falconieri G; Pizzolitto S; Cerruto MA; Brondani G; De Gobbi A; Zattoni F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Jun; 83(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 21826879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Eastham JA; Kattan MW; Riedel E; Begg CB; Wheeler TM; Gerigk C; Gonen M; Reuter V; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2292-5. PubMed ID: 14634399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of margin extent as a predictor of outcome after adjuvant radiotherapy for Gleason score 7 pT3N0 prostate cancer.
Valicenti RK; Chervoneva I; Gomella LG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1093-7. PubMed ID: 15001249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do patients with low volume prostate cancer have prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy?
Furusato B; Rosner IL; Osborn D; Ali A; Srivastava S; Davis CJ; Sesterhenn IA; McLeod DG
J Clin Pathol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):1038-40. PubMed ID: 18552171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Residual Benign Prostate Glandular Tissue after Radical Prostatectomy is Not Associated with the Development of Detectable Postoperative Serum Prostate Specific Antigen.
Greenberg SA; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Cowan JE; Baskin AS; Nguyen HG; Odisho AY; Simko JP; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2021 Sep; 206(3):706-714. PubMed ID: 33905262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
Urology; 1998 Oct; 52(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 9763083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recurrence after radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.
Scheepe JR; Vis AN; Mickisch GH
Onkologie; 2003 Aug; 26(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 12972697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Epstein JI; Pizov G; Walsh PC
Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(11):3582-93. PubMed ID: 7683970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
