306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11068310)
1. Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy.
Chan TY; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
Urology; 2000 Nov; 56(5):823-7. PubMed ID: 11068310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Seminal vesicle involvement after radical prostatectomy: predicting risk factors for progression.
Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Johnson CW; McKiernan JM; Goluboff ET; Abbou CC; Olsson CA; Benson MC
Urology; 2003 Aug; 62(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 12893340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control.
Pound CR; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
Urol Clin North Am; 1997 May; 24(2):395-406. PubMed ID: 9126237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy. A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up.
Epstein JI; Partin AW; Sauvageot J; Walsh PC
Am J Surg Pathol; 1996 Mar; 20(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 8772781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [SIGNIFICANCE OF INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE IN POST-OPERATIVE BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE].
Sakamoto N; Ueda S; Mizoguchi H; Kawahara I; Kobayashi T; Hamaguchi M; Yoshikawa M
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 108(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 29367511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Probability of biochemical recurrence by analysis of pathologic stage, Gleason score, and margin status for localized prostate cancer.
Khan MA; Partin AW; Mangold LA; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
Urology; 2003 Nov; 62(5):866-71. PubMed ID: 14624910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy in men with organ-confined Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma.
Rioux-Leclercq NC; Chan DY; Epstein JI
Urology; 2002 Oct; 60(4):666-9. PubMed ID: 12385930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ten-year survival after radical prostatectomy: specimen Gleason score is the predictor in organ-confined prostate cancer.
Bianco FJ; Wood DP; Cher ML; Powell IJ; Souza JW; Pontes JE
Clin Prostate Cancer; 2003 Mar; 1(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15040883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of paneth cell-like neuroendocrine differentiation in adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Tamas EF; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Aug; 30(8):980-5. PubMed ID: 16861969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary Gleason pattern as a predictor of disease progression in gleason score 7 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of 823 men treated with radical prostatectomy.
Herman CM; Kattan MW; Ohori M; Scardino PT; Wheeler TM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2001 May; 25(5):657-60. PubMed ID: 11342779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in Japanese men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
Miyake H; Muramaki M; Furukawa J; Tanaka H; Inoue TA; Fujisawa M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1511-6. PubMed ID: 22658882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy.
Amin A; Partin A; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1286-90. PubMed ID: 21862072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?
van Oort IM; Schout BM; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen CA; Witjes JA
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 16046051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
