306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11068310)
21. Visual estimation of tumour extent is not an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence.
Jones TD; Koch MO; Lin H; Cheng L
BJU Int; 2005 Dec; 96(9):1253-7. PubMed ID: 16287440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Impact of Downgrading from Biopsy Gleason 7 to Prostatectomy Gleason 6 on Biochemical Recurrence and Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
J Urol; 2017 Apr; 197(4):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 27847296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy.
Miyamoto H; Hernandez DJ; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1693-8. PubMed ID: 19683331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictors of prostate-specific antigen progression among men with seminal vesicle invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Terris MK; Trock B; Kane CJ
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1633-8. PubMed ID: 15073850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prostate specific antigen outcome based on the extent of extracapsular extension and margin status in patients with seminal vesicle negative prostate carcinoma of Gleason score < or = 7.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(9):2110-5. PubMed ID: 10813723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Epstein JI; Pizov G; Walsh PC
Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(11):3582-93. PubMed ID: 7683970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Significance of Gleason Score 7 With Tertiary Pattern 5 at Radical Prostatectomy.
Borhan W; Epstein JI
Urology; 2017 Feb; 100():175-179. PubMed ID: 27810358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years.
Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1831-6. PubMed ID: 7523730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy in men with pathologic organ-confined disease: pT2a versus pT2b.
Freedland SJ; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1646-9. PubMed ID: 15073852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic value of seminal vesicle involvement due to prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Algarra R; Barba J; Merino I; Tienza A; Tolosa E; Robles JE; Zudaire J
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Apr; 39(3):144-53. PubMed ID: 24996780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Isolated local recurrence is rare after radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancer and positive surgical margins: therapeutic implications.
Han M; Pound CR; Potter SR; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):864-6. PubMed ID: 11176487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
