These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11068323)

  • 21. Characterization and assessment of a novel poly(ethylene oxide)/polyurethane composite hydrogel (Aquavene) as a ureteral stent biomaterial.
    Gorman SP; Tunney MM; Keane PF; Van Bladel K; Bley B
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Mar; 39(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 9492227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent.
    Lumiaho J; Heino A; Aaltomaa S; Välimaa T; Talja M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 21222571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of acucise endopyelotomy and endoballoon rupture for management of secondary proximal ureteral stricture in the porcine model.
    Nakada SY; Soble JJ; Gardner SM; Wolf JS; Figenshau RS; Pearle MS; Humphrey PA; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 1996 Aug; 10(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 8872726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term indwelling double-J stents: bulky kidney and urinary bladder calculosis, spontaneous intraperitoneal perforation of the kidney and peritonitis as a result of "forgotten" double-J stent.
    Ivica S; Dragan S
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2009 Mar; 66(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 19341233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In-vivo evaluation of flow characteristics of novel metal ureteral stent.
    Blaschko SD; Deane LA; Krebs A; Abdelshehid CS; Khan F; Borin J; Nguyen A; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2007 Jul; 21(7):780-3. PubMed ID: 17705771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An in vivo evaluation of a novel spiral cut flexible ureteral stent.
    Mucksavage P; Pick D; Haydel D; Etafy M; Kerbl DC; Lee JY; Ortiz-Vanderdys C; Saleh F; Olamendi S; Louie MK; McDougall EM
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):733-7. PubMed ID: 22386429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of optimal stent size after antegrade endopyelotomy: an experimental study in the porcine model.
    Anidjar M; Meria P; Cochand-Priollet B; Cussenot O; Desgrandchamps F; Cortesse A; Teillac P; Le Duc A
    Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 9286661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Drainage and antireflux characteristics of a biodegradable self-reinforced, self-expanding X-ray-positive poly-L,D-lactide spiral partial ureteral stent: an experimental study.
    Lumiaho J; Heino A; Kauppinen T; Talja M; Alhava E; Välimaa T; Törmälä P
    J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1559-64. PubMed ID: 18186698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Double J catheter migrated to the bladder and encrusted. Case report and bibliographic review.
    Gallego D; Beltrán Persiva J; Pérez Mestre M; Povo Martín IJ; Miralles Aguado J; Garau Perelló C; Gimeno Argente V; Bosquet Sanz M; De Francia Valero JA
    Arch Esp Urol; 2012 Mar; 65(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 22414454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical effectiveness of new stent design: randomized single-blind comparison of tail and double-pigtail stents.
    Dunn MD; Portis AJ; Kahn SA; Yan Y; Shalhav AL; Elbahnasy AM; Bercowsky E; Hoenig DM; Wolf JS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2000 Mar; 14(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 10772515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of a microporous thermoplastic polyurethane-covered stent with a self-expanding bare nitinol stent in a porcine iliac artery model.
    Radeleff B; Grenacher L; Christoph P; Sommer CM; Stampfl U; Ramsauer S; Henn T; Kurz P; Lopez-Benitez R; Berger I; Richter GM
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Jul; 20(7):927-35. PubMed ID: 19497761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Choosing an appropriate length of loop type ureteral stent using direct ureteral length measurement.
    Kawahara T; Ito H; Terao H; Yoshida M; Ogawa T; Uemura H; Kubota Y; Matsuzaki J
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22104688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture of polyurethane double pigtail stents: an in vivo retrospective and prospective fluoroscopic study.
    el-Sherif A
    Br J Urol; 1995 Jul; 76(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 7648041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Flow characteristics of 3 unique ureteral stents: investigation of a Poiseuille flow pattern.
    Olweny EO; Portis AJ; Afane JS; Brewer AV; Shalhav AL; Luszczynski K; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):2099-103. PubMed ID: 11061935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Coated v noncoated ureteral metal stents: an experimental model.
    Liatsikos EN; Siablis D; Kalogeropoulou C; Karnabatidis D; Triadopoulos A; Varaki L; Zabakis P; Perimenis P; Barbalias GA
    J Endourol; 2001 Sep; 15(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 11697409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents.
    Taguchi M; Yoshida K; Sugi M; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(6):1224-1233. PubMed ID: 30516929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mechanical performance of polyurethane ureteral stents in vitro and ex vivo.
    Gorman SP; Jones DS; Bonner MC; Akay M; Keane PF
    Biomaterials; 1997 Oct; 18(20):1379-83. PubMed ID: 9363338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative study of ureteral stents following endoureterotomy in the porcine model: 3 vs 6 weeks and 7F vs 14F.
    Soria F; Sánchez FM; Sun F; Ezquerra J; Durán E; Usón J
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2005; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 16059765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigation of a novel degradable ureteral stent in a porcine model.
    Hadaschik BA; Paterson RF; Fazli L; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Chew BH
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1161-6. PubMed ID: 18639278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a New Design of Antireflux-biodegradable Ureteral Stent in Animal Model.
    Soria F; Morcillo E; Serrano A; Budia A; Fernández I; Fernández-Aparicio T; Sanchez-Margallo FM
    Urology; 2018 May; 115():59-64. PubMed ID: 29470998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.