These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11070062)
1. Exploring a phylogenetic approach for the detection of correlated substitutions in proteins. Tuff P; Darlu P Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Nov; 17(11):1753-9. PubMed ID: 11070062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting groups of coevolving positions in a molecule: a clustering approach. Dutheil J; Galtier N BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 7():242. PubMed ID: 18053141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Suzuki Y; Gojobori T Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):1315-28. PubMed ID: 10563013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Episodic evolution of coadapted sets of amino acid sites in mitochondrial proteins. Neverov AD; Popova AV; Fedonin GG; Cheremukhin EA; Klink GV; Bazykin GA PLoS Genet; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1008711. PubMed ID: 33493156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protein map: an alignment-free sequence comparison method based on various properties of amino acids. Yu C; Cheng SY; He RL; Yau SS Gene; 2011 Oct; 486(1-2):110-8. PubMed ID: 21803133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Codon substitution models based on residue similarity and their applications. Liu X; Liu H; Guo W; Yu K Gene; 2012 Nov; 509(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 22902303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of co-evolving amino acid residues on topology of phylogenetic trees. Sherbakov DY; Triboy TI Biochemistry (Mosc); 2007 Dec; 72(12):1363-7. PubMed ID: 18205620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequent and widespread parallel evolution of protein sequences. Rokas A; Carroll SB Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1943-53. PubMed ID: 18583353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting adaptive convergent amino acid evolution. Rey C; Lanore V; Veber P; Guéguen L; Lartillot N; Sémon M; Boussau B Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Jul; 374(1777):20180234. PubMed ID: 31154974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of single substitutions on multiple sequence alignments. Klaere S; Gesell T; von Haeseler A Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):4041-7. PubMed ID: 18852110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A model-based approach for detecting coevolving positions in a molecule. Dutheil J; Pupko T; Jean-Marie A; Galtier N Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Sep; 22(9):1919-28. PubMed ID: 15944445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. Pollock DD; Taylor WR; Goldman N J Mol Biol; 1999 Mar; 287(1):187-98. PubMed ID: 10074416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elements of coevolution in biological sequences. Rivoire O Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Apr; 110(17):178102. PubMed ID: 23679784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of covariation in an SH3 domain sequence alignment: applications in tertiary contact prediction and the design of compensating hydrophobic core substitutions. Larson SM; Di Nardo AA; Davidson AR J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 11031119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony. Tourasse NJ; Gouy M Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]