BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11071399)

  • 1. Field trials--measuring progress in pollution prevention using a chemical hazard score.
    Whaley DA; Barrett SS
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 2000 Nov; 23(4):645-70. PubMed ID: 11071399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporation of potential for multimedia exposure into chemical hazard scores for pollution prevention.
    Whaley DA; Meloy TP; Barrett SS; Bedillion EJ
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1999 Feb; 22(1):241-73. PubMed ID: 10189582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporation of endocrine disruption into chemical hazard scoring for pollution prevention and current list of endocrine disrupting chemicals.
    Whaley DA; Keyes D; Khorrami B
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 2001 Nov; 24(4):359-420. PubMed ID: 11665649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Pollution Prevention on Toxic Environmental Releases from U.S. Manufacturing Facilities.
    Ranson M; Cox B; Keenan C; Teitelbaum D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(21):12951-7. PubMed ID: 26477531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental and risk screening for prioritizing pollution prevention opportunities in the U.S. printed wiring board manufacturing industry.
    Lam CW; Lim SR; Schoenung JM
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 May; 189(1-2):315-22. PubMed ID: 21398034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Industry response to SARA Title III: pollution prevention, risk reduction, and risk communication.
    Santos SL; Covello VT; McCallum DB
    Risk Anal; 1996 Feb; 16(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8868223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute chemical incidents surveillance—Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance, nine states, 1999-2008.
    Orr MF; Wu J; Sloop SL;
    MMWR Suppl; 2015 Apr; 64(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 25856532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hazardous materials events: an industrial comparison.
    Burgess JL; Kovalchick DF; Harter L; Kyes KB; Thompson JN
    J Occup Environ Med; 2000 May; 42(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 10824307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The risk where you live.
    Schmidt CW
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Jun; 111(7):A404-7. PubMed ID: 12782515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hazard screening of chemical releases and environmental equity analysis of populations proximate to toxic release inventory facilities in Oregon.
    Neumann CM; Forman DL; Rothlein JE
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Apr; 106(4):217-26. PubMed ID: 9494125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Waste explosives and other hazardous materials--hazard potential and remedial measures: an overview.
    Pandey RK; Asthana SN; Bhattacharya B; Tiwari I; Ghole VS
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Jul; 49(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 18476443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk management for hazardous chemicals. OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard and EPA's Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Regulations.
    Oleinick A; Fodor WJ; Susselman MM
    J Leg Med; 1988 Jun; 9(2):179-278. PubMed ID: 3045238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Green engineering education through a U.S. EPA/academia collaboration.
    Shonnard DR; Allen DT; Nguyen N; Austin SW; Hesketh R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Dec; 37(23):5453-62. PubMed ID: 14700332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use.
    Novotny TE; Zhao F
    Tob Control; 1999; 8(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10465821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population, development, and the environment: trends and key issues in the developed countries.
    Commoner B
    Int J Health Serv; 1993; 23(3):519-39. PubMed ID: 8375953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of current good manufacturing practices and emission regulations and guidances on the discharge of pharmaceutical chemicals into the environment from manufacturing, use, and disposal.
    Velagaleti R; Burns PK; Gill M; Prothro J
    Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Mar; 110(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 11882470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulating chemicals: law, science, and the unbearable burdens of regulation.
    Silbergeld EK; Mandrioli D; Cranor CF
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2015 Mar; 36():175-91. PubMed ID: 25785889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occupational Health Risk Assessment in the Electronics Industry in China Based on the Occupational Classification Method and EPA Model.
    Cai Y; Li F; Zhang J; Wu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30241294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interim.
    Vogel SA; Roberts JA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 May; 30(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 21555473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a security vulnerability assessment process for the RAMCAP chemical sector.
    Moore DA; Fuller B; Hazzan M; Jones JW
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Apr; 142(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 16920260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.