133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11072214)
21. Is cervical screening necessary in older women?
Cruickshank ME
Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):351-3. PubMed ID: 11843936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Cervical cancer screening in Canadian Native women. Adequacy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Hislop TG; Band PR; Deschamps M; Clarke HF; Smith JM; Ng VT
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 8291352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Quality control in the screening of cervical cancer].
Coleman D
Klin Lab Diagn; 1995; (6):99-101. PubMed ID: 8589987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
Chamberlain J
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The audit of cervical cytology screening programmes: discussion paper.
Ewart HE
J R Soc Med; 1991 Aug; 84(8):488-90. PubMed ID: 1886118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality control in cytologic screening.
Cecchini S; Grazzini G; Bonardi R; Ciatto S
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(3):436. PubMed ID: 8498145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
Weintraub D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.
Payne N; Chilcott J; McGoogan E
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(18):1-73. PubMed ID: 10932023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Proposal to institutionalize criteria and quality standards for cervical cancer screening within a health care system.
Salmerón-Castro J; Kazcano Ponce EC; Pérez Cuevas R; del Río Gómez I; Torres Torija I; Hernández Avila M
Cad Saude Publica; 1998; 14 Suppl 3():67-75. PubMed ID: 9819465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical cancer screening in France.
Schaffer P; Sancho-Garnier H; Fender M; Dellenbach P; Carbillet JP; Monnet E; Gauthier GP; Garnier A
Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2215-20. PubMed ID: 11072207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Screening for cervical cancer in Fife.
Roworth M; Carter H
Public Health; 1988 Mar; 102(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 3375410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Efficacy of organized screening in comparison to spontaneous Pap samples in the prevention of invasive cervical cancer].
Kallio M; Nieminen P; Anttila A; Hakama M
Duodecim; 2001; 117(14):1442-6. PubMed ID: 12181953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Effectiveness of a cancer control programme.
Knox EG; Woodman CB
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):379-401. PubMed ID: 3242791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient?
Herbert A
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 9306928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Wain GV; Hacker NF
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical cancer screening trends, 1992-2000.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):424. PubMed ID: 12644531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. National cervical screening programme.
Slater D
BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):887-8. PubMed ID: 2261531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].
Calvache AE
Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
van Rijswijk A
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(8):399. PubMed ID: 10703599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
