These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11074425)

  • 1. A mixed mode fracture toughness test of bone-biomaterial interfaces.
    Wang X; Agrawal CM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000; 53(6):664-72. PubMed ID: 11074425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interfacial fracture toughness of tissue-biomaterial systems.
    Wang X; Agrawal CM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997; 38(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9086411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a compact sandwich specimen to evaluate fracture toughness and interfacial bonding of bone.
    Wang X; Lankford J; Agrawal CM
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 8580538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mixed-mode fracture toughness of the cobalt-chromium alloy/polymethylmethacrylate cement interface.
    Mann KA; Bhashyam S
    J Orthop Res; 1999 May; 17(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 10376719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone-cement interfacial behaviour under mixed mode loading conditions.
    Wang JY; Tozzi G; Chen J; Contal F; Lupton C; Tong J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Jul; 3(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 20416553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fatigue fracture of the stem-cement interface with a clamped cantilever beam test.
    Heuer DA; Mann KA
    J Biomech Eng; 2000 Dec; 122(6):647-51. PubMed ID: 11192387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interfacial fracture toughness between bovine cortical bone and cements.
    Lucksanasombool P; Higgs WA; Higgs RJ; Swain MV
    Biomaterials; 2003 Mar; 24(7):1159-66. PubMed ID: 12527256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of biocompatible Nanofillers on mixed-mode I and II fracture toughness of PMMA base dentures.
    Mousavi A; Aliha MRM; Imani DM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103566. PubMed ID: 32090956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixed-mode toughness of human cortical bone containing a longitudinal crack in far-field compression.
    Olvera D; Zimmermann EA; Ritchie RO
    Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):331-6. PubMed ID: 22115793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of crack-resistance curves to the mixed-mode fracture toughness of human cortical bone.
    Zimmermann EA; Launey ME; Ritchie RO
    Biomaterials; 2010 Jul; 31(20):5297-305. PubMed ID: 20409579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mixed-mode stress intensity factors for kink cracks with finite kink length loaded in tension and bending: application to dentin and enamel.
    Bechtle S; Fett T; Rizzi G; Habelitz S; Schneider GA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 May; 3(4):303-12. PubMed ID: 20346898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interfacial fracture toughness of synthetic bone-cement interface.
    Tong J
    Key Eng Mater; 2006 Jun; 312():251-256. PubMed ID: 19325935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture characteristics of acrylic bone cement-bone composites.
    Buckley PJ; Orr JF; Revie IC; Breusch SJ; Dunne NJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(6):419-27. PubMed ID: 14702980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micro-mechanical damage of trabecular bone-cement interface under selected loading conditions: a finite element study.
    Zhang QH; Tozzi G; Tong J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(3):230-8. PubMed ID: 22515517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of interfacial fracture toughness of bone-cement interface using sandwich Brazilian disks.
    Tong J; Wong KY; Lupton C
    Eng Fract Mech; 2007 Aug; 74(12):1904-1916. PubMed ID: 19330043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interfacial failure of a dental cement composite bonded to glass substrates.
    Zhou J; Huang M; Sagnang F; Soboyejo WO
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jun; 22(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 16229885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of crack propagation paths at implant/bone-cement interfaces.
    McCormack BA; Prendergast PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Nov; 118(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 8950663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.
    Mann KA; Werner FW; Ayers DC
    J Biomech; 1999 Nov; 32(11):1251-4. PubMed ID: 10541077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture mechanics analyses of ceramic/veneer interface under mixed-mode loading.
    Wang G; Zhang S; Bian C; Kong H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():119-28. PubMed ID: 25123435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting the failure response of cement-bone constructs using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach.
    Mann KA; Damron LA
    J Biomech Eng; 2002 Aug; 124(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 12188213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.