BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11076365)

  • 1. [X-ray diagnostic apparatus in dentistry (a review)].
    Blinov NN; Gubenko MB; Utkin PM
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):40-4. PubMed ID: 11076365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing patient X-ray exposure by 75 percent for less than $75.
    Jones GA; Woods MA; Mincer HH
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1995 Jul; 75(3):66-7. PubMed ID: 9520747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of digital imaging in dentistry.
    Miles DA; Razzano MR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):427-38, viii. PubMed ID: 10740777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [X-ray image detectors in stomatology].
    Gorelik FG
    Med Tekh; 1998; (6):17-9. PubMed ID: 9949983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Significant results of an information survey of radiation doses of dental equipment in the United States, 1973-1976. The DENT-program: (Dental Exposure Normalization Technique)].
    Crabtree CL
    Med Hyg (Geneve); 1981 Oct; 39(1440):3317-23. PubMed ID: 6948150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A survey of all dental x-ray machines in British Columbia using TLD chips 1981-83.
    Morley DR; Greene MW; McConchie JM; Gray AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1985 Sep; 51(9):683-7. PubMed ID: 3902173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Improvement of radiation hygiene with Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic film].
    Rotgans J
    Quintessenz; 1983 Apr; 34(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 6576411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survey of bite-wing entrance surface exposures for dental X-ray generators.
    Holloway AF; McFarlane DJ
    Ont Dent; 1984 Feb; 61(2):23-6, 29. PubMed ID: 6591105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure reduction using Ektaspeed film.
    Howard ML; Stocks HS
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1982; 61(4):37-8. PubMed ID: 6958760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collective dose to the Swedish population from intraoral radiography.
    Stenström B; Bergman K; Blomgren PG; Henrikson CO
    Swed Dent J; 1988; 12(1-2):17-25. PubMed ID: 3164913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States.
    Platin E
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods for reducing patient exposure combined with Kodak Ektaspeed dental x-ray film.
    Silha RE
    Dent Radiogr Photogr; 1981; 54(4):80-7. PubMed ID: 6949795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Are conventional dental x-ray films a thing of the past?].
    Sanderink GC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Dec; 102(12):496-8. PubMed ID: 11836821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Certified radiation safety officers program. The Nassau County experience, 1990-1992.
    Goren AD; Sciubba JJ; Moskowitz GW; Lorio PM; Heller MB
    N Y State Dent J; 1993 Nov; 59(9):63-5. PubMed ID: 8247460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Investigation of X-ray apparatus in dental clinics in Yokosuka and Suntoh areas].
    Saito Y; Kanno M; Kashima I; Higashi T
    Kanagawa Shigaku; 1987 Jun; 22(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 3269420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The new F-speed films in dentistry: a brief review.
    Mupparapu M; Mozaffari E
    Penn Dent J (Phila); 2001; 101():11. PubMed ID: 15484637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of dental schools in future film selection.
    Goren AD; Sciubba JJ; Moskowitz GW
    N Y State Dent J; 1991; 57(7):41-3. PubMed ID: 1923147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of radiation doses received from constant direct current and conventional self-rectified panoramic dental x-ray equipment.
    Forest D; Deschamps M; Normandeau L
    J Dent Que; 1981; 18():9-17. PubMed ID: 6945322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.