These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11076366)

  • 1. [The technical support of mammography].
    Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality control in mammography.
    Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further comparisons of films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
    Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Feb; 63(746):128-31. PubMed ID: 2310905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
    Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):163-7. PubMed ID: 2924096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography].
    Gorelik FG
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The use of the Daylight System in mammography].
    Giuseppetti G; Maggi S; Ercolani P; Procaccini G; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2781054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The reduction of radiation burden in mammography using film-screen combination systems].
    Waegner U; Geissler S; Rosenkranz G
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 2277840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Film-screen combinations for mammography].
    Säbel M; Aichinger H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 May; 1(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 1878377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The choice of radiographic film-screen systems: quality evaluation and purchasing specifications drafting. Report on A.I.F.B. Working Group activity.
    Borasi G; Bregant P; Crespi A; De Denaro M; Ferretti PP; De Guarrini F; Levrero F; Mozzo P; Novario R; Pedroli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 May; 85(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 8327771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of blue and green systems of image visualization in roentgenology].
    Riuduger IuG
    Med Tekh; 2004; (6):40-5. PubMed ID: 15656416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
    Tsalafoutas OA; Kolovos CA; Tsapaki V; Betsou S; Koliakou E; Maniatis PN; Xenofos S
    Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems.
    Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.