128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11077207)
1. Correlations among evoked potential thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell loss following various noise exposures in the chinchilla.
Hamernik RP; Qiu W
Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):245-57. PubMed ID: 11077207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the estimation of hearing and sensory cell loss in noise-damaged cochleas.
Davis B; Qiu W; Hamernik RP
Hear Res; 2004 Jan; 187(1-2):12-24. PubMed ID: 14698083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise-induced threshold shift dynamics measured with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials in chinchillas with inner hair cell deficient cochleas.
Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Jock BM; Bennett JA
Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 118(1-2):73-82. PubMed ID: 9606062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DPOAE level shifts and ABR threshold shifts compared to detailed analysis of histopathological damage from noise.
Harding GW; Bohne BA; Ahmad M
Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 174(1-2):158-71. PubMed ID: 12433407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in noise-exposed chinchillas.
Davis B; Qiu W; Hamernik RP
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Feb; 16(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 15807046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of infrasound on cochlear damage from exposure to a 4 kHz octave band of noise.
Harding GW; Bohne BA; Lee SC; Salt AN
Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):128-38. PubMed ID: 17300889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of DPOAEs for assessing hearing loss caused by styrene in the rat.
Pouyatos B; Campo P; Lataye R
Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):156-64. PubMed ID: 12031525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antioxidant treatment reduces blast-induced cochlear damage and hearing loss.
Ewert DL; Lu J; Li W; Du X; Floyd R; Kopke R
Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):29-39. PubMed ID: 22326291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise-induced hearing loss in the noise-toughened auditory system.
Ahroon WA; Hamernik RP
Hear Res; 1999 Mar; 129(1-2):101-10. PubMed ID: 10190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interrupted noise exposures: threshold shift dynamics and permanent effects.
Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3478-88. PubMed ID: 9637033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship among distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, evoked potential thresholds, and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures.
Subramaniam M; Henderson D; Spongr V
Ear Hear; 1994 Aug; 15(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 7958529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of high-frequency interrupted noise exposures on evoked-potential thresholds, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and outer hair cell loss.
Subramaniam M; Henselman LW; Spongr V; Henderson D; Powers NL
Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):372-81. PubMed ID: 8549893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. R-phenylisopropyladenosine attenuates noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla.
Hu BH; Zheng XY; McFadden SL; Kopke RD; Henderson D
Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):198-206. PubMed ID: 9387999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of tuning curve variables and threshold measures in the estimation of sensory cell loss.
Ahroon WA; Davis RI; Hamernik RP
Audiology; 1993; 32(4):244-59. PubMed ID: 8343081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evoked-potential thresholds and cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the chinchilla following carboplatin treatment and noise exposure.
Jock BM; Hamernik RP; Aldrich LG; Ahroon WA; Petriello KL; Johnson AR
Hear Res; 1996 Jul; 96(1-2):179-90. PubMed ID: 8817317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift.
Nordmann AS; Bohne BA; Harding GW
Hear Res; 2000 Jan; 139(1-2):13-30. PubMed ID: 10601709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporary DPOAE level shifts, ABR threshold shifts and histopathological damage following below-critical-level noise exposures.
Harding GW; Bohne BA
Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 196(1-2):94-108. PubMed ID: 15464306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures.
Subramaniam M; Salvi RJ; Spongr VP; Henderson D; Powers NL
Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 74(1-2):204-16. PubMed ID: 8040089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the normal and noise-damaged chinchilla cochlea.
Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Lei SF
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1003-12. PubMed ID: 8759953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions in young and aged chinchillas exposed to low-frequency noise.
McFadden SL; Campo P
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2290-7. PubMed ID: 10491693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
