BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11078064)

  • 1. Pathogenesis of attic cholesteatoma: clinical and immunohistochemical support for combination of retraction theory and proliferation theory.
    Sudhoff H; Tos M
    Am J Otol; 2000 Nov; 21(6):786-92. PubMed ID: 11078064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathogenesis of sinus cholesteatoma.
    Sudhoff H; Tos M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 264(10):1137-43. PubMed ID: 17534638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histological and immunohistochemical study of pars tensa retraction pocket.
    Shunyu NB; Gupta SD; Thakar A; Sharma SC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 145(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 21593461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retraction pockets and attic cholesteatomas.
    Sadé J
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1980; 34(1):62-84. PubMed ID: 6162358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pathogenesis of attic retraction pocket and cholesteatoma as studied by computed tomography.
    Kobayashi T; Toshima M; Yaginuma Y; Ishidoya M; Suetake M; Takasaka T
    Am J Otol; 1994 Sep; 15(5):658-62. PubMed ID: 8572068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attic cholesteatoma with tiny retraction of pars flaccida.
    Lee JH; Hong SM; Kim CW; Park YH; Baek SH
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Apr; 42(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 25199742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Current concepts of the pathogenesis of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma].
    Welkoborsky HJ
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Jan; 90(1):38-48; quiz 49-50. PubMed ID: 21225533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical manifestation of attic retraction pocket].
    Zheng Y; Ou Y; Yang H; Liu X; Chen S; Liu W
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 19(16):737-9. PubMed ID: 16320713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Otoendoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery of the middle ear: what benefits can be expected?
    Ayache S; Tramier B; Strunski V
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1085-90. PubMed ID: 18836388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expression patterns of cytokeratins in retraction pocket cholesteatomas.
    Kim HJ; Tinling SP; Chole RA
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):1032-6. PubMed ID: 11404616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The status of the contralateral ear in children with acquired cholesteatoma.
    Hassman-Poznańska E; Kurzyna A; Trzpis K; Poznańska M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 132(4):404-8. PubMed ID: 22235981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expression of p53 protein in human middle ear cholesteatomas: pathogenetic implications.
    Albino AP; Reed JA; Bogdany JK; Sassoon J; Desloge RB; Parisier SC
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 9455944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The posterior attic: An observational study of aboriginal Australians with chronic otitis media (COM) and a theory relating to the low incidence of cholesteatomatous otitis media versus the high rate of mucosal otitis media.
    Jassar P; Murray P; Wabnitz D; Heldreich C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1165-7. PubMed ID: 16420963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aggressiveness and quantification of epithelial proliferation of middle ear cholesteatoma by MIB1.
    Mallet Y; Nouwen J; Lecomte-Houcke M; Desaulty A
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Feb; 113(2):328-31. PubMed ID: 12567091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attic cholesteatoma. Recurrence rate related to observation time.
    Tos M; Lau T
    Am J Otol; 1988 Nov; 9(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 3232716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of attic retraction pockets.
    Honnurappa V; Mahajan N; Vijayendra VK; Vassiliu S; Redleaf M
    J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Nov; 137(11):1272-1276. PubMed ID: 37203214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical studies on attic retraction].
    Kawashima E
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1991 Nov; 94(11):1738-47. PubMed ID: 1757849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of scutum erosion in the diagnosis of temporal bone cholesteatoma.
    Yu Z; Han D; Gong S; Wang Z; Zhang L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19579143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preventive tympanoplasty in children: a new approach.
    Chiossone E
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1995; 116(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 7569376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Follow-up of cholesteatoma surgery: open versus closed tympanoplasty.
    Stankovic M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(5):299-305. PubMed ID: 17630475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.