BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11078138)

  • 1. The efficacy of bioresorbable fixation in the repair of mandibular fractures: an animal study.
    Quereshy FA; Goldstein JA; Goldberg JS; Beg Z
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Nov; 58(11):1263-9. PubMed ID: 11078138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rigid internal fixation with titanium versus bioresorbable miniplates in the repair of mandibular fractures in rabbits.
    Hochuli-Vieira E; Cabrini Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA; Gabrielli MF; Padilha JG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15695046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective trial of poly-L-lactic/polyglycolic acid co-polymer plates and screws for internal fixation of mandibular fractures.
    Ferretti C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 37(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 18295449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the use of arch bars or interdental wire fixation necessary for successful outcomes in the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures?
    Bell RB; Wilson DM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2116-22. PubMed ID: 18848111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
    Cox T; Kohn MW; Impelluso T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):481-7; discussion 487-8. PubMed ID: 12684967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a comparison of 2 techniques.
    Mehra P; Murad H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 66(11):2254-60. PubMed ID: 18940489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications after zygoma fracture fixation: is there a difference between biodegradable materials and how do they compare with titanium osteosynthesis?
    Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Yerit K; Voracek M; Turhani D; Watzinger F; Enislidis G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 16545702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of bioresorbable plating systems in paediatric mandible fractures.
    Stanton DC; Liu F; Yu JW; Mistretta MC
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1305-9. PubMed ID: 24815762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fixation of bimaxillary osteotomies with resorbable plates and screws: experience in 20 consecutive cases.
    Edwards RC; Kiely KD; Eppley BL
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 59(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 11243608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of straight and curved 3-dimensional titanium miniplates for fracture fixation at the mandibular angle.
    Zix J; Lieger O; Iizuka T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 65(9):1758-63. PubMed ID: 17719394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can an arch bar replace a second lag screw in management of anterior mandibular fractures?
    Emam HA; Stevens MR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 22079063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Zorzan E; Zerman N; Politi M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 16546644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 1 week of maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.
    Chritah A; Lazow SK; Berger JR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1737-41. PubMed ID: 16297694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioresorbable versus titanium plates for mandibular fractures.
    Ahmed W; Ali Bukhari SG; Janjua OS; Luqman U; Shah I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jul; 23(7):480-3. PubMed ID: 23823951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of stability of titanium and absorbable plate and screw fixation for mandibular angle fractures.
    Esen A; Ataoğlu H; Gemi L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 18718777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of fixation stability of resorbable versus titanium plate and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
    Bayram B; Araz K; Uckan S; Balcik C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1644-8. PubMed ID: 19615576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resorbable plates for the fixation of mandibular fractures: a prospective study.
    Laughlin RM; Block MS; Wilk R; Malloy RB; Kent JN
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 17174770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using a single bioresorbable miniplate.
    Bayat M; Garajei A; Ghorbani K; Motamedi MH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1573-7. PubMed ID: 20417018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equivalence randomized controlled trial of bioresorbable versus titanium miniplates in treatment of mandibular fracture: a pilot study.
    Bhatt K; Roychoudhury A; Bhutia O; Trikha A; Seith A; Pandey RM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1842-8. PubMed ID: 20100633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. INION compared with titanium osteosynthesis: a prospective investigation of the treatment of mandibular fractures.
    Leonhardt H; Demmrich A; Mueller A; Mai R; Loukota R; Eckelt U
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 46(8):631-4. PubMed ID: 18597909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.