BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11078775)

  • 1. Tracking the peer-review process.
    Campion EW; Curfman GD; Drazen JM
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(20):1485-6. PubMed ID: 11078775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning to review.
    Freedman R
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review: should we modify our process?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review and refereeing in science.
    Lore W
    East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
    Scarfe WC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
    Liu SV
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publishing and getting published.
    Gardner G
    Collegian; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 15534956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The peer review process II: to review and be reviewed.
    Riss P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 May; 23(5):513-4. PubMed ID: 21901437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open-access journal will publish first, judge later.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7123):9. PubMed ID: 17203032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
    Fisher RS; Powers LE
    Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Selected summaries].
    Müller-Lissner S
    Z Gastroenterol; 2011 Jul; 49(12):1525. PubMed ID: 22139874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
    Downer M
    Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
    Davies J
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The trouble with replication.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten simple rules for getting published.
    Bourne PE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 1(5):e57. PubMed ID: 16261197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.