These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11079035)
1. Expert review of histologic slides and Papanicolaou tests in the context of litigation or potential litigation. Surgical Pathology Committee and Cytopathology Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Fitzgibbons PL; Austin RM Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Nov; 124(11):1717-9. PubMed ID: 11079035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. College of American Pathologists Conference XXX on quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: summation. Austin RM Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):341-2. PubMed ID: 9111131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An overview of the College of American Pathologists' programs in surgical pathology and cytopathology. Data summary of diagnostic performance in cervical cytopathology. Penner DW Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):439-42. PubMed ID: 2750431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring the significance of participant evaluation of acceptability of cases in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology. Renshaw AA; Mody DR; Wang E; Wilbur DC; Colgan TJ; Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Sep; 129(9):1093-6. PubMed ID: 16119978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The confused pathology expert: the ongoing challenge of monitoring physician expert witness testimony. Austin RM; McCoy DR Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Dec; 35(12):749-55. PubMed ID: 18008344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the expert witness database. Wood WS Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 9111130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring the significance of field validation in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology: how good are the experts? Renshaw AA; Wang E; Mody DR; Wilbur DC; Davey DD; Colgan TJ; Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 May; 129(5):609-13. PubMed ID: 15859630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance activities of the College of American Pathologists. Kraemer BB Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 2750430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. College of American Pathologists Conference XXX on quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: introduction. Austin RM Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 9111105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytopathology laboratory improvement programs of the College of American Pathologists: Laboratory Accreditation Program (CAP LAP) and Performance Improvement Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (CAP PAP). Nielsen ML Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 9111112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality improvement opportunities in gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlations: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 4. Crothers BA; Jones BA; Cahill LA; Moriarty AT; Mody DR; Tench WD; Souers RJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 23368862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practice protocols for surgical pathology. A communication from the Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Ruby SG; Henson DE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Feb; 118(2):120-1. PubMed ID: 8311647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of field validation in the interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology. Oxley DK Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Feb; 130(2):144; author reply 144-5. PubMed ID: 16454546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Follow-up of abnormal gynecologic cytology. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 16,312 cases from 306 laboratories. Austin RM Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Aug; 124(8):1113-4. PubMed ID: 10923066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: a defense lawyer's perspective. Varner CD Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 9111126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of Trichomonas vaginalis in different Papanicolaou test preparations: trends over time in the College of American Pathologists educational Interlaboratory Comparison Program. Howell LP; Darragh TM; Souers RJ; Thomas N; Moriarty AT Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 137(8):1043-6. PubMed ID: 23899059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unsatisfactory reporting rates: 2006 practices of participants in the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in gynecologic cytology. Moriarty AT; Clayton AC; Zaleski S; Henry MR; Schwartz MR; Eversole GM; Tench WD; Fatheree LA; Souers RJ; Wilbur DC Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Dec; 133(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 19961244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines for educational notes, disclaimers, and similar comments on reports of cervical cytology specimens. Papanicolau Society of Cytopathology Practice Guidelines Task Force Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 May; 28(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 12722126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]