149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11079854)
21. Stereoscopic digital mammogram: Usefulness in daily practice.
Ferre R; Goumot PA; Mesurolle B
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Jun; 47(6):231-236. PubMed ID: 29621618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Test for the assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of mammography. Results of 103 tests carried out by Italian radiologists].
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Ambrogetti D; Catarzi S; Morrone D
Radiol Med; 1996 Oct; 92(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 9045233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.
Berg WA; Campassi C; Langenberg P; Sexton MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1769-77. PubMed ID: 10845521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.
Bozkurt S; Gimenez F; Burnside ES; Gulkesen KH; Rubin DL
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Aug; 62():224-31. PubMed ID: 27388877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Presentation of the French translation of the Breast Imaging Reporting System and Data System (BI-RADS)].
Lévy L; Suissa M; Bokobsa J; Tristant H; Chiche JF; Martin B; Teman G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 May; 33(5):338-47. PubMed ID: 15922646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CADMIUM II: acquisition and representation of radiological knowledge for computerized decision support in mammography.
Alberdi E; Taylor P; Lee R; Fox J; Sordo M; Todd-Pokropek A
Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():7-11. PubMed ID: 11079834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The technique and results of mammography].
Friedrich M
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance parameters for mammography screening.
Ellis RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):W204; author reply W205. PubMed ID: 18941056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Breast calcifications. The usefulness of a standardized system for the description and assessment of the mammographic findings to improve the positive predictive value].
Perugini G; Bonzanini B; Valentino C
Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 10780213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The research of mammography based on Bayesian classification].
Ji L; Hui B; Wu S
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 28(3):475-8. PubMed ID: 21774205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Basic principles of mammographic diagnosis.
Tabár L; Dean PB
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):146-57. PubMed ID: 3849365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Variability and errors when applying the BIRADS mammography classification.
Boyer B; Canale S; Arfi-Rouche J; Monzani Q; Khaled W; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 22483607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 8539365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography and breast imaging reporting and data system on breast diseases].
Li JG; Li S; Liu Q; Zhao TT
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 45(7):464-6. PubMed ID: 17686303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer.
Kahn CE; Roberts LM; Shaffer KA; Haddawy P
Comput Biol Med; 1997 Jan; 27(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 9055043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nonspecific findings confound screening for breast cancer.
Wagner SK
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Mar; 22(3):41-2, 45-6. PubMed ID: 10947282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Improving mammographic decision accuracy by incorporating observer ratings with interpretation time.
Saunders RS; Samei E
Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S117-22. PubMed ID: 17209116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
