238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11079920)
1. The new peer review.
Kohane IS; Altman RB
Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():433-7. PubMed ID: 11079920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The peer review process (aka peer reviewology).
Yucha CB
Biol Res Nurs; 2002 Oct; 4(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 12408212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [How to reward and stimulate the task of reviewing scientific articles?].
Muccioli C; Campos M; Goldchmit M; Dantas PE; Bechara SJ; Costa VP
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(1):5. PubMed ID: 17505710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning to review.
Freedman R
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
Pravinkumar E
Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9385):747. PubMed ID: 12957106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Open-access journal will publish first, judge later.
Giles J
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7123):9. PubMed ID: 17203032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Publishers soldier on despite electronic bugs.
Dalton R
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):264. PubMed ID: 12124587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
Jefferson T; Shashok K
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
Shim EH; Parekh V
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer Review beyond Journals.
Pulverer B; Lemberger T
EMBO J; 2019 Dec; 38(23):e103998. PubMed ID: 31788827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bad peer reviewers.
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Priority of discovery in the life sciences.
Vale RD; Hyman AA
Elife; 2016 Jun; 5():. PubMed ID: 27310529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
List A
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Web quality control for lectures: Supercourse and Amazon.com.
Linkov F; LaPorte R; Lovalekar M; Dodani S
Croat Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):875-8. PubMed ID: 16342339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
Mower A; Youngkin ME
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
