238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11079920)
21. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
Fisher RS; Powers LE
Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
DeCoursey TE
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts.
Manske PR
J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Has the time come for preprints in biology?
Bhalla N
Mol Biol Cell; 2016 Apr; 27(8):1185-7. PubMed ID: 27079652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
Lomnicki A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
Downer M
Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
Senturia SD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer review: should we modify our process?
Berquist TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic.
Brierley L; Nanni F; Polka JK; Dey G; Pálfy M; Fraser N; Coates JA
PLoS Biol; 2022 Feb; 20(2):e3001285. PubMed ID: 35104285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Keeping peer-reviewed publication relevant in the internet age.
Randleman JB
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):447-8. PubMed ID: 22767161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Preprints and the implications for subsequent peer review and publishing.
Gross RA
Neurology; 2018 Nov; 91(19):855-856. PubMed ID: 30194244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Constants and scientific progress.
Dzau V; Frank M; Reich M; Austin MJ; Aebersold R; Cowley A; Housman D; Mulligan R; Rosenberg R
Physiol Genomics; 1999 Nov; 1(3):107. PubMed ID: 11015568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Swift publication would reward good reviewers.
Koonin EV
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6930):374. PubMed ID: 12660754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
Scarfe WC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Peer review and refereeing in science.
Lore W
East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The peer review process II: to review and be reviewed.
Riss P
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 May; 23(5):513-4. PubMed ID: 21901437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Electronic publishing in radiology: beginnings, current status, and expanding horizons.
Chew FS; Llewellyn K; Olsen KM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):741-8. PubMed ID: 17411694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
Brookfield J
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. To publish or perish: how to review a manuscript.
Winck JC; Fonseca JA; Azevedo LF; Wedzicha JA
Rev Port Pneumol; 2011; 17(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 21477574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
