These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11081755)

  • 1. Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE.
    Beattie RC; Bleech J
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Oct; 34(5):305-9. PubMed ID: 11081755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of sample size on the noise floor and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Beattie RC; Ireland A
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 10888346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
    Whitehead ML; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate and short-term reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Beattie RC; Kenworthy OT; Luna CA
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Sep; 42(6):348-54. PubMed ID: 14570243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
    Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.
    Uchida Y; Ando F; Shimokata H; Sugiura S; Ueda H; Nakashima T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 18595184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in infants from birth to two months].
    Pinto VS; Lewis DR
    Pro Fono; 2007; 19(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 17710346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Average optimal DPOAE primary tone levels in normal-hearing adults.
    Marcrum SC; Kummer P; Kreitmayer C; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):325-32. PubMed ID: 27010374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid measurement of auditory steady-state responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions using an amplitude-modulated primary tone.
    Oswald JA; Rosner T; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3886-95. PubMed ID: 16838532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitudes and latencies in the groups of older people with presbyacusis and young people with normal hearing].
    Namysłowski G; Morawski K; Urbaniec P; Lisowska G
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2000; 54(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 11070698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Kuroda T; Fukuda S; Chida E; Kashiwamura M; Matsumura M; Ohwatari R; Inuyama Y
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2001 May; 28 Suppl():S33-8. PubMed ID: 11683340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Wolter NE; Harrison RV; James AL
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.