These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11081827)

  • 1. The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension.
    Westwood DA; Heath M; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Oct; 134(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 11081827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects.
    Westwood DA; Dubrowski A; Carnahan H; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Dec; 135(4):535-43. PubMed ID: 11156317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Rival C; Olivier I; Ceyte H; Ferrel C
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 153(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 14513301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping.
    Hu Y; Eagleson R; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 May; 126(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 10333011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.
    Whitwell RL; Ganel T; Byrne CM; Goodale MA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():216. PubMed ID: 25999834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of the Uznadze illusion is temporally dynamic in closed-loop but temporally constant in open-loop grasping.
    Uccelli S; Bruno N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1238-1249. PubMed ID: 37784227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.
    Tang R; Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():49-63. PubMed ID: 25704582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length.
    Biegstraaten M; de Grave DD; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 17146650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.
    Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time course analysis of closed- and open-loop grasping of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Heath M; Rival C; Westwood DA; Neely K
    J Mot Behav; 2005 May; 37(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 15883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Heath M; Rival C; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 15278330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opposite effects on perception and action induced by the Ponzo illusion.
    Bartelt R; Darling WG
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Oct; 146(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 12355271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.
    Westwood DA; Goodale MA
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):243-54. PubMed ID: 12858950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Otto-de Haart EG; Carey DP; Milne AB
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1437-44. PubMed ID: 10617263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures.
    Heath M; Rival C; Neely K
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 16175361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The visual control of stepping operates in real time: Evidence from a pictorial illusion.
    McCarville EM; Westwood DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):405-10. PubMed ID: 16307236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual illusions and the control of children arm movements.
    Gentilucci M; Benuzzi F; Bertolani L; Gangitano M
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 11163371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.
    Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jan; 10(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 9526087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.