These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11082856)

  • 1. Stroop interference and negative priming: problems with inferences from null results.
    Marí-Beffa P; Estévez AF; Danziger S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):499-503. PubMed ID: 11082856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: new evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition.
    Catena A; Fuentes LJ; Tudela P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Mar; 9(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 12026942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coloring single stroop elements: reducing automaticity or slowing color processing?
    Monahan JS
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Jan; 128(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 11277451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?
    Brown TL; Gore CL; Carr TH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):220-40. PubMed ID: 12049241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stroop effects on redemption and semantic effects on confession: simultaneous automatic activation of embedded and carrier words.
    Iani C; Job R; Padovani R; Nicoletti R
    Cogn Process; 2009 Nov; 10(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 19301049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further evidence that negative priming in the Stroop color-word task is equivalent in older and younger adults.
    Little DM; Hartley AA
    Psychol Aging; 2000 Mar; 15(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 10755285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stroop effect in words that differ from color words in one letter only.
    Bibi U; Tzelgov J; Henik A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Dec; 7(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 11206209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stroop interference and negative priming in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Vitkovitch M; Bishop S; Dancey C; Richards A
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1570-6. PubMed ID: 11985838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic priming in the prime task effect: evidence of automatic semantic processing of distractors.
    Marí-Beffa P; Fuentes LJ; Catena A; Houghton G
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):635-47. PubMed ID: 10946546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks.
    Shao Z; Roelofs A; Martin RC; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1806-1820. PubMed ID: 26030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stroop interference effects in partially colored Stroop words.
    Danziger S; Estévez AF; Marí-Beffa P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):536-41. PubMed ID: 12412894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Word reading practice reduces Stroop interference in children.
    Protopapas A; Vlahou EL; Moirou D; Ziaka L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():204-8. PubMed ID: 24607439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Augustinova M; Flaudias V; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):827-33. PubMed ID: 21169576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: evidence from incremental priming.
    Ziegler JC; Ferrand L; Jacobs AM; Rey A; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):671-92. PubMed ID: 10994225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Manwell LA; Roberts MA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):458-62. PubMed ID: 15376795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.