167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11082863)
1. The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).
Baddeley AD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):544-9. PubMed ID: 11082863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
Neath I
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: a test of the phonological loop model and the feature model.
Hanley JR; Bakopoulou E
Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):435-44. PubMed ID: 12921421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
Larsen JD; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Some evidence for 'speech' as an acoustic feature.
Morton J; Chambers SM
Br J Psychol; 1976 Feb; 67(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 1268450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Irrelevant speech effects and statistical learning.
Neath I; Guérard K; Jalbert A; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1551-9. PubMed ID: 19370483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.
Leist L; Lachmann T; Schlittmeier SJ; Georgi M; Klatte M
Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):307-320. PubMed ID: 36190658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000).
Jones DM; Tremblay S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):550-8. PubMed ID: 11082864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: implications for models of short-term verbal memory.
Larsen JD; Baddeley A; Andrade J
Memory; 2000 May; 8(3):145-57. PubMed ID: 10889899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Habituation to irrelevant speech: effects on a visual short-term memory task.
Morris N; Jones DM
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 2326151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
Kattner F; Ellermeier W
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elimination of the word length effect by irrelevant sound revisited.
Tremblay S; Macken WJ; Jones DM
Mem Cognit; 2000 Jul; 28(5):841-6. PubMed ID: 10983458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
Hanley JR; Shah N
Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
Saito S; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
Coltheart V; Langdon R
Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits.
Divin W; Coyle K; James DT
Br J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 92(Pt 4):593-616. PubMed ID: 11762863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overlap of phonetic features as a determinant of the between-stream phonological similarity effect.
Eagan DE; Chein JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 21928935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects.
Martín-Loeches M; Schweinberger SR; Sommer W
Mem Cognit; 1997 Jul; 25(4):471-83. PubMed ID: 9259625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
