These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11082864)

  • 21. The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits.
    Divin W; Coyle K; James DT
    Br J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 92(Pt 4):593-616. PubMed ID: 11762863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
    Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The irrelevant sound effect: what needs modelling, and a tentative model.
    Page MP; Norris DG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1289-300; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 14578085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The irrelevant speech effect: a PET study.
    Gisselgård J; Petersson KM; Baddeley A; Ingvar M
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(14):1899-911. PubMed ID: 14572523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.
    Beaman CP; Jones DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Aug; 51(3):615-36. PubMed ID: 9745380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
    Marsh JE; Jones DM
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: a new approach to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1154-65. PubMed ID: 8805820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adapting to an irrelevant item in an immediate recall task.
    Watkins MJ; Sechler ES
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):682-92. PubMed ID: 2811665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What characterizes changing-state speech in affecting short-term memory? An EEG study on the irrelevant sound effect.
    Schlittmeier SJ; Weisz N; Bertrand O
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1669-80. PubMed ID: 22067074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Background instrumental music and serial recall.
    Nittono H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1307-13. PubMed ID: 9229452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Silent reading rate and memory span.
    Poirier M; Schweickert R; Oliver J
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):380-7. PubMed ID: 15948624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Overlap of phonetic features as a determinant of the between-stream phonological similarity effect.
    Eagan DE; Chein JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 21928935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC; Neely CB; Wilson JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Mar; 23(2):472-83. PubMed ID: 9080015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Some evidence for 'speech' as an acoustic feature.
    Morton J; Chambers SM
    Br J Psychol; 1976 Feb; 67(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 1268450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects.
    Bell R; Buchner A; Mund I
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 18573011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduced top-down influence in auditory perceptual organization in schizophrenia.
    Silverstein SM; Matteson S; Knight RA
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1996 Nov; 105(4):663-7. PubMed ID: 8952201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.