265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11083350)
1. Outcome indicators for stroke: application of an algorithm treatment across the continuum of postacute rehabilitation services.
Bates BE; Stineman MG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Nov; 81(11):1468-78. PubMed ID: 11083350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: a comparison of lengths of stay and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs health care system.
Stineman MG; Ross RN; Hamilton BB; Maislin G; Bates B; Granger CV; Asch DA
Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 11176550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes from stroke rehabilitation in Veterans Affairs rehabilitation units: detecting and correcting for selection bias.
Vogel WB; Rittman M; Bradshaw P; Nissen D; Anderson L; Bates B; Marshall C
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(3):367-83. PubMed ID: 12173757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stroke rehabilitation management in the Department of Veterans Affairs: impact of patient referral source on outcomes.
O'Donnell JC; Hamilton BB
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 78(9):929-37. PubMed ID: 9305263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in rehabilitation services and outcomes among stroke patients cared for in veterans hospitals.
Hoenig H; Sloane R; Horner RD; Zolkewitz M; Reker D
Health Serv Res; 2001 Feb; 35(6):1293-318. PubMed ID: 11221820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stroke rehabilitation outcome variation in Veterans Affairs rehabilitation units: accounting for case-mix.
Reker DM; O'Donnell JC; Hamilton BB
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Jul; 79(7):751-7. PubMed ID: 9685086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Key neurological impairments influence function-related group outcomes after stroke.
Han L; Law-Gibson D; Reding M
Stroke; 2002 Jul; 33(7):1920-4. PubMed ID: 12105376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial.
Strasser DC; Falconer JA; Stevens AB; Uomoto JM; Herrin J; Bowen SE; Burridge AB
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jan; 89(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18164324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A taxonomy for classification of stroke rehabilitation services.
Hoenig H; Sloane R; Horner RD; Zolkewitz M; Duncan PW; Hamilton BB
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Jul; 81(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 10895995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stroke rehabilitation in Australia in a freestanding inpatient rehabilitation unit compared with a unit located in an acute care hospital.
Katrak PH; Black D; Peeva V
PM R; 2011 Aug; 3(8):716-22. PubMed ID: 21871415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of the introduction of a case-mix-based funding model of rehabilitation for severe stroke: an Australian experience.
Brock KA; Vale SJ; Cotton SM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 88(7):827-32. PubMed ID: 17601460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and administrative outcomes during publicly-funded inpatient stroke rehabilitation based on a case-mix group classification model.
Gagnon D; Nadeau S; Tam V
J Rehabil Med; 2005 Jan; 37(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 15788332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inpatient stroke rehabilitation lengths of stay in Canada derived from the National Rehabilitation Reporting System, 2008 and 2009.
Grant C; Goldsmith CH; Anton HA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 24001444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes of patients with posterior cerebral artery stroke.
Ng YS; Stein J; Salles SS; Black-Schaffer RM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Nov; 86(11):2138-43. PubMed ID: 16271561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Racial disparities in outcomes of inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
Bhandari VK; Kushel M; Price L; Schillinger D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Nov; 86(11):2081-6. PubMed ID: 16271552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of effective and efficient rehabilitation programs.
Johnston MV; Wood KD; Fiedler R
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 84(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 12638110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward benchmarks for stroke rehabilitation in Ontario, Canada.
Bagg SD; Pombo AP; Hopman WM
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 85(12):971-6. PubMed ID: 17033593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Australian National Sub-acute and Non-acute Patient Casemix Classification (AN-SNAP): its application and value in a stroke rehabilitation programme.
Lowthian P; Disler P; Ma S; Eagar K; Green J; de Graaff S
Clin Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 14(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 11043880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke.
Duncan PW; Horner RD; Reker DM; Samsa GP; Hoenig H; Hamilton B; LaClair BJ; Dudley TK
Stroke; 2002 Jan; 33(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 11779907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the Siebens Model in Geriatric-Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation to Reduce Institutionalization and Acute-Care Readmissions.
Kushner DS; Peters KM; Johnson-Greene D
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2016 Feb; 25(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 26542820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
