76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11084496)
1. [Simple refixation: how far to go?].
Huten D; Bouabdallah N; Bassaine M; Wodecki P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():72-5. PubMed ID: 11084496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Results of severe bone loss (grades 4)].
Puget J
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():63-6. PubMed ID: 11084493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Therapeutic proposals by lesion stage: evaluation and perspectives].
Migaud H; Courpied JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():86-9. PubMed ID: 11084501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Results of low bone loss (grades 0 and 1)].
Caton J; Merabet Z
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():56-9. PubMed ID: 11084491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Results of mild bone loss (grades 2 and 3)].
Vidalain JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():60-3. PubMed ID: 11084492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Advantages and disadvantages of extensive osseous approaches].
Migaud H; Gueguen G; Duhamel A
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():69-71. PubMed ID: 11084495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Advantages and limitations of impacted morselized grafts].
Vielpeau C; Hulet C; Elmoataz H; Texier A; Geffard B
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():77-80. PubMed ID: 11084498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Femoral revision with cemented prosthesis without graft].
Le Corre N
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():43-4. PubMed ID: 11084485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Femoral revision in iterative aseptic hip arthroplasties. Introduction].
Courpied JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():37. PubMed ID: 11084483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Pre-and peroperative femoral fractures].
Mertl P; de Lestang M; Havet E; Roux O; Vives P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():66-8. PubMed ID: 11084494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Global results and complications].
Bonnomet F; Clavert P; Laffargue P; Duhamel A
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():48-50. PubMed ID: 11084488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impaction allografting for massive femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty using collared textured stems.
Van Kleunen JP; Anbari KK; Vu D; Garino JP
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):362-71. PubMed ID: 16627144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Femoral revision with cementless prosthesis without graft].
Nourissat C
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():44-6. PubMed ID: 11084486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impaction bone grafting.
Schreurs BW; Buma P
Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Dec; 72(6):661-3. PubMed ID: 11817885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Role of bone substitutes in reconstructions of the femur after revision of hip prosthesis].
Bizot P; Nich C
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():83-6. PubMed ID: 11084500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 22-mm vs the 32-mm femoral head in cemented primary hip arthroplasty long-term clinical and radiological follow-up study.
Shaju KA; Hasan ST; D'Souza LG; McMahon B; Masterson EL
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 16230243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Implants and technics used in total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than thirty years old].
Flecher X; Helix M; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94 Suppl(6):S138-41. PubMed ID: 18928801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Advantages and limitations of massive allografts].
Poilvache P; Hannouche D; Lecorre N
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():80-2. PubMed ID: 11084499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years.
McInnis DP; Horne G; Devane PA
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 16627145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
